Who Should Undergo Surgery for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis? Treatment Effect Predictors in SPORT
- 1 October 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Spine
- Vol. 38 (21), 1799-1811
- https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0b013e3182a314d0
Abstract
Study Design. Combined prospective randomized controlled trial and observational cohort study of degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS) with an as-treated analysis. Objective. To determine modifiers of the treatment effect (TE) of surgery (the difference between surgical and nonoperative outcomes) for DS using subgroup analysis. Summary of Background Data. Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial demonstrated a positive surgical TE for DS at the group level. However, individual characteristics may affect TE. Methods. Patients with DS were treated with either surgery (n = 395) or nonoperative care (n = 210) and were analyzed according to treatment received. Fifty-five baseline variables were used to define subgroups for calculating the time-weighted average TE for the Oswestry Disability Index during 4 years (TE = [INCREMENT] Oswestry Disability Indexsurgery− [INCREMENT] Oswestry Disability Indexnonoperative). Variables with significant subgroup-by-treatment interactions (P< 0.05) were simultaneously entered into a multivariate model to select independent TE predictors. Results. All analyzed subgroups that included at least 50 patients improved significantly more with surgery than with nonoperative treatment (P< 0.05). Multivariate analyses demonstrated that age 67 years or less (TE −15.7 vs.−11.8 for age >67, P= 0.014); female sex (TE −15.6 vs.−11.2 for males, P= 0.01); the absence of stomach problems (TE −15.2 vs.−11.3 for those with stomach problems, P= 0.035); neurogenic claudication (TE −15.3 vs.−9.0 for those without claudication, P= 0.004); reflex asymmetry (TE −17.3 vs.−13.0 for those without asymmetry, P= 0.016); opioid use (TE −18.4 vs.−11.7 for those not using opioids, P< 0.001); not taking antidepressants (TE −14.5 vs.−5.4 for those on antidepressants, P= 0.014); dissatisfaction with symptoms (TE −14.5 vs.−8.3 for those satisfied or neutral, P= 0.039); and anticipating a high likelihood of improvement with surgery (TE −14.8 vs.−5.1 for anticipating a low likelihood of improvement with surgery, P= 0.019) were independently associated with greater TE. Conclusion. Patients who met strict inclusion criteria improved more with surgery than with nonoperative treatment, regardless of other specific characteristics. However, TE varied significantly across certain subgroups. Level of Evidence: 3Keywords
This publication has 41 references indexed in Scilit:
- A systematic review on the effectiveness of pharmacological interventions for chronic non-specific low-back painEuropean Spine Journal, 2010
- Does Multilevel Lumbar Stenosis Lead to Poorer Outcomes?Spine, 2010
- Predictors of outcome after decompressive lumbar surgery and instrumented posterolateral fusionEuropean Spine Journal, 2010
- Degenerative Spondylolisthesis Versus Spinal StenosisSpine, 2010
- The Impact of Workersʼ Compensation on Outcomes of Surgical and Nonoperative Therapy for Patients With a Lumbar Disc HerniationSpine, 2010
- Spine Patient Outcomes Research TrialSpine, 2008
- Reliability of Readings of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features of Lumbar Spinal StenosisSpine, 2008
- Surgical versus Nonsurgical Therapy for Lumbar Spinal StenosisThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2008
- Surgical versus Nonsurgical Treatment for Lumbar Degenerative SpondylolisthesisThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2007
- The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)Medical Care, 1992