Surgical versus Nonsurgical Therapy for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Top Cited Papers
- 21 February 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in The New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 358 (8), 794-810
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa0707136
Abstract
Surgery for spinal stenosis is widely performed, but its effectiveness as compared with nonsurgical treatment has not been shown in controlled trials. Surgical candidates with a history of at least 12 weeks of symptoms and spinal stenosis without spondylolisthesis (as confirmed on imaging) were enrolled in either a randomized cohort or an observational cohort at 13 U.S. spine clinics. Treatment was decompressive surgery or usual nonsurgical care. The primary outcomes were measures of bodily pain and physical function on the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form General Health Survey (SF-36) and the modified Oswestry Disability Index at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 and 2 years. A total of 289 patients were enrolled in the randomized cohort, and 365 patients were enrolled in the observational cohort. At 2 years, 67% of patients who were randomly assigned to surgery had undergone surgery, whereas 43% of those who were randomly assigned to receive nonsurgical care had also undergone surgery. Despite the high level of nonadherence, the intention-to-treat analysis of the randomized cohort showed a significant treatment effect favoring surgery on the SF-36 scale for bodily pain, with a mean difference in change from baseline of 7.8 (95% confidence interval, 1.5 to 14.1); however, there was no significant difference in scores on physical function or on the Oswestry Disability Index. The as-treated analysis, which combined both cohorts and was adjusted for potential confounders, showed a significant advantage for surgery by 3 months for all primary outcomes; these changes remained significant at 2 years. In the combined as-treated analysis, patients who underwent surgery showed significantly more improvement in all primary outcomes than did patients who were treated nonsurgically. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00000411.)Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Surgical versus Nonsurgical Treatment for Lumbar Degenerative SpondylolisthesisThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2007
- Surgical vs Nonoperative Treatment for Lumbar Disk HerniationJAMA, 2006
- Surgical vs Nonoperative Treatment for Lumbar Disk HerniationJAMA, 2006
- United States’ Trends and Regional Variations in Lumbar Spine Surgery: 1992–2003Spine, 2006
- Descriptive Epidemiology and Prior Healthcare Utilization of Patients in the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial’s (SPORT) Three Observational CohortsSpine, 2006
- Unilateral Laminectomy for Bilateral Decompression of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Prospective Comparative Study with Conservatively Treated PatientsJournal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques, 2002
- The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of Data Quality, Scaling Assumptions, and Reliability Across Diverse Patient GroupsMedical Care, 1994
- The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)Medical Care, 1992
- The Effect of Decompression on the Natural Course of Spinal StenosisSpine, 1991
- Patient Satisfaction with Medical Care for Low-Back PainSpine, 1986