Financial performance explanations and institutional setting
- 1 January 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd in Accounting and Business Research
- Vol. 40 (5), 421-450
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2010.9995322
Abstract
The aim of this study is to investigate whether country differences in the institutional setting for financial reporting affect the attributes of managers’ explanations of performance in management commentary reports. We include 172 listed companies from five industries (building materials, food processors, pharmaceuticals, biotechnology and retail) in the UK, Australia, the USA and Canada in 2003. We find significant country differences in attributional properties of performance explanations in management commentary reports. The US and Canadian companies are generally less assertive and less defensive in causal explanations offered compared to their counterparts in the UK and Australia. The North American companies are also more extensive and formal in their explanations, relying more heavily on technical‐accounting language. These tendencies are most pronounced in the USA, where the aggregate of private and public enforcement is greatest. Taken together, our evidence suggests that higher expected regulatory and litigation costs induce a more elaborative, but risk‐averse explanatory stance that may well reduce the overall incremental value of the explanations offered.Keywords
This publication has 68 references indexed in Scilit:
- East—West Differences in Attributions for Company PerformanceJournal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 2008
- Enforcement and its Impact on Cost of Equity and Liquidity of the MarketSSRN Electronic Journal, 2006
- Picking up the pieces: impression management in the retrospective attributional framing of accounting outcomesAccounting, Organizations and Society, 2005
- Why Do Managers Explain Their Earnings Forecasts?Journal of Accounting Research, 2004
- Do financial analysts get intangibles?European Accounting Review, 2003
- Accountability as a deterrent to self-enhancement: The search for mechanisms.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2002
- Self‐Serving Attributions in Corporate Annual Reports: A Replicated StudyJournal of Management Studies, 2002
- Self‐serving attributions, managerial cognition, and company performanceStrategic Management Journal, 1991
- The Justification of Organizational PerformanceAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1983
- Does having to justify one's judgments change the nature of the judgment process?Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1983