Few systematic reviews exist documenting the extent of bias: a systematic review
- 31 May 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 61 (5), 422-434
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.10.017
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 73 references indexed in Scilit:
- Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic ReviewsPLoS Medicine, 2007
- Towards systematic reviews that inform health care management and policy-makingJournal of Health Services Research & Policy, 2005
- Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized TrialsPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,2004
- Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?Controlled Clinical Trials, 1996
- Publication Decisions Revisited: The Effect of the Outcome of Statistical Tests on the Decision to Publish and Vice VersaThe American Statistician, 1995
- Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trialsJama-Journal Of The American Medical Association, 1995
- Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. A meta-analysisJama-Journal Of The American Medical Association, 1994
- Factors influencing publication of research results. Follow-up of applications submitted to two institutional review boardsJAMA, 1992
- Bias in Treatment Assignment in Controlled Clinical TrialsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1983
- Publication Decisions and Their Possible Effects on Inferences Drawn from Tests of Significance--Or Vice VersaJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1959