Measurement of the severity of disability in community-dwelling adults and older adults: interval-level measures for accurate comparisons in large survey data sets
Open Access
- 9 September 2016
- Vol. 6 (9), e011842
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011842
Abstract
Objectives To (1) create a single metric of disability using Rasch modelling to be used for comparing disability severity levels across groups and countries, (2) test whether the interval-level measures were invariant across countries, sociodemographic and health variables and (3) examine the gains in precision using interval-level measures relative to ordinal scores when discriminating between groups known to differ in disability. Design Cross-sectional, population-based study. Setting/participants Data were drawn from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE), including comparable data across 16 countries and involving 58 489 community-dwelling adults aged 50+. Main outcome measures A single metric of disability composed of self-care and instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs) and functional limitations. We examined the construct validity through the fit to the Rasch model and the know-groups method. Reliability was examined using person separation reliability. Results The single metric fulfilled the requirements of a strong hierarchical scale; was able to separate persons with different levels of disability; demonstrated invariance of the item hierarchy across countries; and was unbiased by age, gender and different health conditions. However, we found a blurred hierarchy of ADL and IADL tasks. Rasch-based measures yielded gains in relative precision (11–116%) in discriminating between groups with different medical conditions. Conclusions Equal-interval measures, with person-invariance and item-invariance properties, provide epidemiologists and researchers with the opportunity to gain better insight into the hierarchical structure of functional disability, and yield more reliable and accurate estimates of disability across groups and countries. Interval-level measures of disability allow parametric statistical analysis to confidently examine the relationship between disability and continuous measures so frequent in health sciences (eg, cholesterol, blood pressure, C reactive protein).This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Factors associated with increasing functional decline in multimorbid independently living older peopleMaturitas, 2013
- Losing the Ability in Activities of Daily Living in the Oldest Old: A Hierarchic Disability Scale from the Newcastle 85+ StudyPLOS ONE, 2012
- Measurement Equivalence in ADL and IADL Difficulty Across International Surveys of Aging: Findings From the HRS, SHARE, and ELSAThe Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 2011
- Calibrating ADL-IADL scales to improve measurement accuracy and to extend the disability construct into the preclinical range: a systematic reviewBMC Geriatrics, 2011
- Limitations in physical functioning among older people as a predictor of subsequent disability in instrumental activities of daily livingAge and Ageing, 2011
- Latent variable modeling of disability in people aged 65 or moreStatistical Methods & Applications, 2010
- The Classic Measure of Disability in Activities of Daily Living Is Biased by Age but an Expanded IADL/ADL Measure Is NotThe Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 2010
- Extent of Social Inequalities in Disability in the Elderly: Results From a Population-based Study of British MenAnnals of Epidemiology, 2008
- Good Practices for Identifying Differential Item FunctioningMedical Care, 2006
- Measuring Disability in Medicare Home Care PatientsMedical Care, 2003