Measurement Equivalence in ADL and IADL Difficulty Across International Surveys of Aging: Findings From the HRS, SHARE, and ELSA
Open Access
- 12 December 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
- Vol. 67B (1), 121-132
- https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbr133
Abstract
To examine the measurement equivalence of items on disability across three international surveys of aging. Data for persons aged 65 and older were drawn from the Health and Retirement Survey (HRS, n = 10,905), English Longitudinal Study of Aging (ELSA, n = 5,437), and Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE, n = 13,408). Differential item functioning (DIF) was assessed using item response theory (IRT) methods for activities of daily living (ADL) and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) items. HRS and SHARE exhibited measurement equivalence, but 6 of 11 items in ELSA demonstrated meaningful DIF. At the scale level, this item-level DIF affected scores reflecting greater disability. IRT methods also spread out score distributions and shifted scores higher (toward greater disability). Results for mean disability differences by demographic characteristics, using original and DIF-adjusted scores, were the same overall but differed for some subgroup comparisons involving ELSA. Testing and adjusting for DIF is one means of minimizing measurement error in cross-national survey comparisons. IRT methods were used to evaluate potential measurement bias in disability comparisons across three international surveys of aging. The analysis also suggested DIF was mitigated for scales including both ADL and IADL and that summary indexes (counts of limitations) likely underestimate mean disability in these international populations.This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Classic Measure of Disability in Activities of Daily Living Is Biased by Age but an Expanded IADL/ADL Measure Is NotThe Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 2010
- Later-Life Mental Health in Europe: A Country-Level ComparisonThe Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 2009
- Still Happy After All These Years: Research Frontiers on Subjective Well-being in Later LifeThe Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 2009
- Comparing Incomparable Survey Responses: Evaluating and Selecting Anchoring VignettesPolitical Analysis, 2007
- Assessing and Understanding Measurement Equivalence in Health Outcome MeasuresMedical Care, 2006
- True health vs response styles: exploring cross-country differences in self-reported healthHealth Economics, 2006
- Disease and Disadvantage in the United States and in EnglandJAMA, 2006
- A Comparison of Item Response Theory and Confirmatory Factor Analytic Methodologies for Establishing Measurement Equivalence/InvarianceOrganizational Research Methods, 2004
- Comparability of self rated health: cross sectional multi-country survey using anchoring vignettesBMJ, 2004
- Efficacy and Tolerability of Donepezil in Vascular DementiaStroke, 2003