What Does It Mean to Take an Ethics+ Approach to Global Biobank Governance?
- 2 December 2017
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Asian Bioethics Review
- Vol. 9 (4), 285-300
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s41649-017-0030-z
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- “Forward-Thinking” in U.S. BiobankingGenetic Testing and Molecular Biomarkers, 2017
- Reconfiguring Social Value in Health Research Through the Lens of LiminalityBioethics, 2017
- Access Governance for Biobanks: The Case of the BioSHaRE-EU CohortsBiopreservation and Biobanking, 2016
- ‘Pop-Up’ Governance: developing internal governance frameworks for consortia: the example of UK10KLife Sciences, Society and Policy, 2015
- What Role for Law, Human Rights, and Bioethics in an Age of Big Data, Consortia Science, and Consortia Ethics? The Importance of TrustworthinessLaws, 2015
- Taiwan Regulation of BiobanksThe Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2015
- Can regulation and governance make a difference?Regulation & Governance, 2007
- The Ethical Challenges of Genetic Databases: Safeguarding Altruism and TrustKing's Law Journal, 2007
- The Ethics and Governance of Medical Research: What does regulation have to do with morality?New Review of Bioethics, 2003
- Safeguards for research using large scale DNA collectionsBMJ, 2000