Refractive lenticule extraction small incision lenticule extraction: A new refractive surgery paradigm
Open Access
- 1 January 2018
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Medknow in Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
- Vol. 66 (1), 10-19
- https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.ijo_761_17
Abstract
Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE), a variant of refractive lenticule extraction technology is becoming increasingly popular, as a flapless and minimally invasive form of laser vision correction (LVC) for the treatment of myopia and myopic astigmatism. This review aims at summarizing the principles, surgical technique, and clinical outcomes in terms of visual and refractive results, safety, efficacy, postoperative dry eye, aberrations, and biomechanics of SMILE and its comparison with other conventional techniques of LVC, such as laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). Recent advancements in the laser frequency and energy delivery patterns, instrumentation, and surgical techniques have shown significant improvement in the visual recovery and outcomes after SMILE, compared to the initial results published by Sekundo and Shah et al. Most of the recently published literature on long-term outcomes of SMILE shows excellent stability of the procedure, especially for higher myopia. In terms of the postoperative dry eye, SMILE shows a clear advantage over LASIK as numerous studies have shown significant differences about the Schirmer's, Tear film break up time, corneal sensitivity, and corneal nerve regeneration to be better following SMILE compared to LASIK. There is some evidence that since the Bowman's membrane (BM) and the anterior lamellae remain intact after SMILE, this may be a potential advantage for corneal biomechanics over LASIK and PRK where the BM is either severed or ablated, respectively, however, the data on biomechanics are inconclusive at present. Overall, this procedure has proved to be promising, delivering equivalent, or better visual and refractive results to LASIK and providing clear advantage in terms of being a flapless, minimally invasive procedure with minimal pain and postoperative discomfort thus offering high patient satisfaction.Keywords
This publication has 78 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of Four Different VisuMax Circle Patterns for Flap Creation After Small Incision Lenticule ExtractionJournal of Refractive Surgery, 2013
- Predictors for the Outcome of Small-incision Lenticule Extraction for MyopiaJournal of Refractive Surgery, 2012
- Femtosecond (FS) laser vision correction procedure for moderate to high myopia: a prospective study of ReLEx® flex and comparison with a retrospective study of FS‐laser in situ keratomileusisActa Ophthalmologica, 2012
- Intraocular Pressure During Corneal Flap Preparation: Comparison Among Four Femtosecond Lasers in Porcine EyesJournal of Refractive Surgery, 2011
- Femtosekunden-Lentikel-Extraktion (FLEx) - Ergebnisse nach 12 Monaten bei myopen AstigmatismusKlinische Monatsblätter für Augenheilkunde, 2010
- Small incision corneal refractive surgery using the small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) procedure for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism: results of a 6 month prospective studyBritish Journal of Ophthalmology, 2010
- Manual limbal markings versus iris-registration software for correction of myopic astigmatism by laser in situ keratomileusisJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2010
- Accuracy and Reproducibility of Artemis Central Flap Thickness and Visual Outcomes of LASIK With the Carl Zeiss Meditec VisuMax Femtosecond Laser and MEL 80 Excimer Laser PlatformsJournal of Refractive Surgery, 2010
- First efficacy and safety study of femtosecond lenticule extraction for the correction of myopiaJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2008
- Cyclotorsional eye motion occurring between wavefront measurement and refractive surgeryJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2004