Public Preferences About Secondary Uses of Electronic Health Information
Top Cited Papers
- 28 October 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in JAMA Internal Medicine
- Vol. 173 (19), 1798-806
- https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.9166
Abstract
As health information technology grows, secondary uses of personal health information offer promise in advancing research, public health, and health care. Public perceptions about sharing personal health data are important for establishing and evaluating ethical and regulatory structures to oversee the use of these data. To measure patient preferences about sharing their electronic health information for secondary purposes (other than their own health care). In this conjoint analysis study, we surveyed 3336 adults (568 Hispanic, 500 non-Hispanic African American, and 2268 non-Hispanic white); participants were randomized to 6 of 18 scenarios describing secondary uses of electronic health information, constructed with 3 attributes: uses (research, quality improvement, or commercial marketing), users (university hospitals, commercial enterprises, or public health departments), and data sensitivity (whether it included genetic information about their own cancer risk). This design enabled participants to reveal their preferences for secondary uses of their personal health information. Participants responded to each conjoint scenario by rating their willingness to share their electronic personal health information on a 1 to 10 scale (1 represents low willingness; 10, high willingness). Conjoint analysis yields importance weights reflecting the contribution of a dimension (use, user, or sensitivity) to willingness to share personal health information. The use of data was a more important factor in the conjoint analysis (importance weight, 64.3%) than the user (importance weight, 32.6%) and data sensitivity (importance weight, 3.1%). In unadjusted linear regression models, marketing uses (β = -1.55), quality improvement uses (β = -0.51), drug company users (β = -0.80), and public health department users (β = -0.52) were associated with less willingness to share health information than research uses and university hospital users (all P < .001). Hispanics and African Americans differentiated less than whites between uses. Participants cared most about the specific purpose for using their health information, although differences were smaller among racial and ethnic minorities. The user of the information was of secondary importance, and the sensitivity was not a significant factor. These preferences should be considered in policies governing secondary uses of health information.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Privacy Versus Public Health: The Impact of Current Confidentiality RulesAmerican Journal of Public Health, 2010
- Consent for use of personal information for health research: Do people with potentially stigmatizing health conditions and the general public differ in their opinions?BMC Medical Ethics, 2009
- The Obligation to Participate in Biomedical ResearchJAMA, 2009
- Alternatives to project-specific consent for access to personal information for health research: Insights from a public dialogueBMC Medical Ethics, 2008
- Development of a Revised Health Care System Distrust ScaleJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2008
- Alternatives to Project-specific Consent for Access to Personal Information for Health Research: What Is the Opinion of the Canadian Public?Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2007
- Attitudes and perceptions of patients towards methods of establishing a DNA biobankCell and Tissue Banking, 2007
- Genetic information: Special or not? Responses from focus groups with members of a health maintenance organizationAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 2007
- Patients, privacy and trust: Patients’ willingness to allow researchers to access their medical recordsSocial Science & Medicine (1982), 2007
- Trust in Physicians and Medical Institutions: What Is It, Can It Be Measured, and Does It Matter?The Milbank Quarterly, 2001