Whose Quality of Life? Ethical Implications in Patient-Reported Health Outcome Measurement
- 1 June 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Value in Health
- Vol. 12 (4), 613-617
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00488.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Individualized assessment of quality of life in idiopathic Parkinson's diseaseMovement Disorders, 2006
- The Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39): evidence for a method of imputing missing dataAge and Ageing, 2006
- Respondent burden and patient-perceived validity of the PDQ-39Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, 2006
- Factors impacting on quality of life in Parkinson's disease: Results from an international surveyMovement Disorders, 2002
- Measuring quality of life: Are quality of life measures patient centred?BMJ, 2001
- Is the short form 36 (SF-36) suitable for routine health outcomes assessment in health care for older people? Evidence from preliminary work in community based health services in England.Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 1996
- The Swedish SF-36 Health Survey—I. Evaluation of data quality, scaling assumptions, reliability and construct validity across general populations in SwedenSocial Science & Medicine (1982), 1995
- The development and validation of a short measure of functioning and well being for individuals with Parkinson's diseaseQuality of Life Research, 1995
- The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of Data Quality, Scaling Assumptions, and Reliability Across Diverse Patient GroupsMedical Care, 1994
- ParkinsonismNeurology, 1967