Application Fever: Reviewing the Causes, Costs, and Cures for Residency Application Inflation
Open Access
- 10 March 2021
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Cureus
- Vol. 13 (3)
- https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.13804
Abstract
Over the past decade, the number of residency applications submitted per applicant has nearly doubled. This epidemic of “Application Fever” is expensive for applicants, burdensome for programs, and ultimately does not improve overall Match outcomes. In this review, we discuss the phenomenon of Application Fever, with a focus on contributing factors and costs of this behavior. Application Fever has its origins in the early 1990s. At that time, the number of residency applicants began to outpace the number of available positions. Because an applicant who applies to more residency programs has a greater probability of securing a residency position than an otherwise equivalent applicant who applies to fewer, "overapplication" became a dominant strategy and residency applicants began to apply to more residency programs each year. This trend was enhanced and enabled by the introduction of the Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS). Although Application Fever is a rational decision for applicants, it imposes a substantial evaluative burden on program directors and necessitates the use of convenience screening metrics. We then briefly review potential solutions, including informational strategies, application limits, and marketplace incentives to reduce application numbers. Although a fixed cap on applications would reduce application numbers and facilitate a holistic selection process, greater transparency from residency programs regarding their selection criteria would be required to help applicants choose where to apply. To improve the residency application process for programs and applicants alike, we call upon the medical community to further study Application Fever and carefully consider solutions, including fixed application caps.This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Educational and Personal Opportunity Costs of Medical Student Preparation for the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 Exam: A Single-Center StudyCureus, 2020
- The Case for Capping Residency InterviewsJournal of Surgical Education, 2020
- On Step 1 Mania, USMLE Score Reporting, and Financial Conflict of Interest at the National Board of Medical ExaminersAcademic Medicine, 2020
- Objective Measures Needed — Program Directors’ Perspectives on a Pass/Fail USMLE Step 1The New England Journal of Medicine, 2020
- Student Perspectives on the “Step 1 Climate” in Preclinical Medical EducationAcademic Medicine, 2019
- A Computer Simulation Model to Analyze the Application Process for Competitive Residency ProgramsJournal of Graduate Medical Education, 2019
- I dream of Gini: Quantifying inequality in otolaryngology residency interviewsThe Laryngoscope, 2018
- Viewpoint From 2 Graduate Medical Education Deans Application Overload in the Residency Match ProcessJournal of Graduate Medical Education, 2016
- Relationship Between the Number of Residency Applications and the Yearly Match Rate: Time to Start Thinking About an Application Limit?Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 2015
- Residency directorsʼ responses to the concept of a proposed electronic residency application serviceAcademic Medicine, 1994