I dream of Gini: Quantifying inequality in otolaryngology residency interviews
- 8 November 2018
- journal article
- conference paper
- Published by Wiley in The Laryngoscope
- Vol. 129 (3), 627-633
- https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.27521
Abstract
Objectives Otolaryngology applicants routinely decry conflicting interview dates because this limits the number of interviews that one can attend, despite being offered an interview. Conversely, applicants also perceive that a large number of interviews are offered to a minority of applicants. We sought to verify and quantify the inequality in distribution of interviews attended. Study Design Retrospective analysis of the National Resident Matching Program (NRMP) 2016 Charting Outcomes in the Match and Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS) historic specialty data. Methods The Gini coefficient, a commonly used indicator of economic inequality, was calculated using data from the 2016 Charting Outcomes in the Match to estimate the distribution of interviews attended. This data was compared to nine other specialties, comprising a wide range of competitiveness and specialty size. Results 26% (110 of 416) of otolaryngology applicants accounted for half (1,721 of 3,426) of all possible interview positions. The Gini coefficient ranged from 0.43 to 0.84 across 10 specialties, with a higher coefficient indicating higher inequality. The Gini coefficient among otolaryngology applicants was 0.43, indicating lower inequality than most other specialties. When including only applicants who interviewed, the Gini coefficient was 0.23. Conclusion There is an unequal distribution of interview invitations, which likely reflects the reality of asymmetry in applicant competitiveness. Otolaryngology demonstrates the greatest equality in distribution, which may stem from a greater burden of hoarding. The specialty's perceived competitiveness mitigates factors such as cost and time, essentially encouraging more people to take as many interviews as they can. Level of Evidence NA. Laryngoscope, 2018Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- 2017: The Year Otolaryngology Had to “Scramble”Otolaryngology -- Head and Neck Surgery, 2017
- The State of the Otolaryngology Match: A Review of Applicant Trends, “Impossible” Qualifications, and ImplicationsOtolaryngology -- Head and Neck Surgery, 2017
- Current Interview Trail Metrics in the Otolaryngology MatchOtolaryngology -- Head and Neck Surgery, 2017
- Reforming the Match Process—Early Decision Plans and the Case for a Consortia MatchJAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 2016
- Rising Residency ApplicationsOtolaryngology -- Head and Neck Surgery, 2015
- Increasing Competitiveness for an Otolaryngology ResidencyOtolaryngology -- Head and Neck Surgery, 2015
- Relationship Between the Number of Residency Applications and the Yearly Match Rate: Time to Start Thinking About an Application Limit?Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 2015
- State of Otolaryngology MatchOtolaryngology -- Head and Neck Surgery, 2015
- Discrimination against international medical graduates in the United States residency program selection processBMC Medical Education, 2010
- Perceived Biases and Prejudices Experienced by International Medical Graduates in the US Post-Graduate Medical Education SystemMedical Education Online, 2006