Identifying whole grain foods: a comparison of different approaches for selecting more healthful whole grain products
Open Access
- 4 January 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Public Health Nutrition
- Vol. 16 (12), 2255-2264
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s1368980012005447
Abstract
Objective: Eating whole grains (WG) is recommended for health, but multiple conflicting definitions exist for identifying whole grain (WG) products, limiting the ability of consumers and organizations to select such products. We investigated how five recommended WG criteria relate to healthfulness and price of grain products.Design: We categorized grain products by different WG criteria including: the industry-sponsored Whole Grain stamp (WG-Stamp); WG as the first ingredient (WG-first); WG as the first ingredient without added sugars (WG-first-no-added-sugars); the word ‘whole’ before any grain in the ingredients (‘whole’-anywhere); and a content of total carbohydrate to fibre of ≤10:1 (10:1-ratio). We investigated associations of each criterion with health-related characteristics including fibre, sugars, sodium, energy, trans-fats and price.Setting: Two major grocery store chains.Subjects: Five hundred and forty-five grain products.Results: Each WG criterion identified products with higher fibre than products considered non-WG; the 10:1-ratio exhibited the largest differences (+3·15 g/serving, P < 0·0001). Products achieving the 10:1-ratio also contained lower sugar (−1·28 g/serving, P = 0·01), sodium (−15·4 mg/serving, P = 0·04) and likelihood of trans-fats (OR = 0·14, P < 0·0001), without energy differences. WG-first-no-added-sugars performed similarly, but identified many fewer products as WG and also not a lower likelihood of containing trans-fats. The WG-Stamp, WG-first and ‘whole’-anywhere criteria identified products with a lower likelihood of trans-fats, but also significantly more sugars and energy (P < 0·05 each). Products meeting the WG-Stamp or 10:1-ratio criterion were more expensive than products that did not (+$US 0·04/serving, P = 0·009 and +$US 0·05/serving, P = 0·003, respectively).Conclusions: Among proposed WG criteria, the 10:1-ratio identified the most healthful WG products. Other criteria performed less well, including the industry-supported WG-Stamp which identified products with higher fibre and lower trans-fats, but also higher sugars and energy. These findings inform efforts by consumers, organizations and policy makers to identify healthful WG products.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2012 UpdateCirculation, 2012
- Components of a Cardioprotective DietCirculation, 2011
- Putting the Whole Grain Puzzle Together: Health Benefits Associated with Whole Grains—Summary of American Society for Nutrition 2010 Satellite Symposium1–3Journal of Nutrition, 2011
- Nutrition labels on pre-packaged foods: a systematic reviewPublic Health Nutrition, 2011
- Impact of an Organizational Intervention Designed to Improve Snack and Beverage Quality in YMCA After-School ProgramsAmerican Journal of Public Health, 2010
- The Preventable Causes of Death in the United States: Comparative Risk Assessment of Dietary, Lifestyle, and Metabolic Risk FactorsPLoS Medicine, 2009
- Effect of a Low–Glycemic Index or a High–Cereal Fiber Diet on Type 2 DiabetesJama-Journal Of The American Medical Association, 2008
- Perceptions of Children, Parents, and Teachers Regarding Whole-Grain Foods, and Implications for a School-Based InterventionJournal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 2006
- Use of the think-aloud method to identify factors influencing purchase of bread and cereals by low-income African American women and implications for whole-grain education☆☆☆Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 2003
- Whole‐grain consumption and chronic disease: Protective mechanismsNutrition and Cancer, 1997