How do SAGES members rate its guidelines?
- 7 November 2013
- journal article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Surgical Endoscopy
- Vol. 28 (4), 1153-1157
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3296-6
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidenceJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2011
- GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction—GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tablesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2011
- GRADE guidelines: A new series of articles in the Journal of Clinical EpidemiologyJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2011
- SAGES guidelines for the clinical application of laparoscopic biliary tract surgerySurgical Endoscopy, 2010
- What is the utilization of the SAGES guidelines by its members?Surgical Endoscopy, 2010
- Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in clinical practice guidelinesAllergy, 2009
- E-mail Survey Response Rates: A ReviewJournal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2006
- Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategiesHealth Technology Assessment, 2004
- Adherence to practice guidelines: The role of specialty society guidelinesAmerican Heart Journal, 2003
- The role of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (L.C.)Surgical Endoscopy, 1993