What is the utilization of the SAGES guidelines by its members?
- 20 May 2010
- journal article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Surgical Endoscopy
- Vol. 24 (12), 3210-3215
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1117-8
Abstract
The development and implementation of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines involves many challenges. The Society of the American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) has been at the forefront of guideline development for laparoscopic surgery since 1991, providing its membership with guidelines on the clinical application of procedures and the granting of privileges. The objective of this study was to assess the use of SAGES guidelines by its members.An electronic survey of SAGES members was conducted via e-mail in August 2007. Members were asked if they used the guidelines, how often, for what purposes and when, and to rank the frequency of use and the usefulness of each of the 26 guidelines. They also were asked to suggest topics for new guideline development and to provide comments.Two hundred thirty-nine SAGES members (4.1%) responded to the survey; 121 (50%) responders used the guidelines. Of these, 95% accessed the guidelines monthly or less often, 58% after hours, 52% during work hours, and 9% while on call. Reasons for guideline use included developing practice protocols (56%) and patient treatment paradigms (51%), creating education and training guidelines for staff privileges (35%), and credentialing new medical staff (25%). The most often used and most useful guidelines included clinical application guidelines on laparoscopic bariatric, antireflux, biliary, and colorectal surgery, laparoscopic appendectomy, and deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis. Some respondents indicated no knowledge of guideline existence and made requests for new guidelines.The results of this survey provided valuable information about current use of SAGES guidelines by its members. The pattern of use highlights the need for interventions that increase member awareness and adoption of these guidelines. Such efforts are currently underway.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prevention of venous thromboembolism: Improving practice in surgical patientsInternational Journal of Surgery, 2009
- Evidence‐based medicine and practice guidelines: Application to geneticsSeminars in Medical Genetics, Part C of the American Journal of Medical Genetics, 2009
- Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines: Part 2 of 3. The GRADE approach to grading quality of evidence about diagnostic tests and strategiesAllergy, 2009
- Compliance to Consensus Recommendations, Surgeon's Experience, and Introduction of a Quality Assurance and Management ProgramInternational Journal of Gynecologic Cancer, 2009
- American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guidelines: Opportunities and ChallengesJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2008
- Comparative Response to a Survey Executed by Post, E-mail, & Web FormJournal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2006
- E-mail Survey Response Rates: A ReviewJournal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2006
- VARIATIONS AMONG HIGH VOLUME SURGEONS IN THE RATE OF COMPLICATIONS AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: FURTHER EVIDENCE THAT TECHNIQUE MATTERSJournal of Urology, 2005
- Variations in Morbidity after Radical ProstatectomyThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Assessing the Impact of Continuous Quality Improvement on Clinical Practice: What It Will Take to Accelerate ProgressThe Milbank Quarterly, 1998