The Ethical Problems with Sham Surgery in Clinical Research
- 23 September 1999
- journal article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in The New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 341 (13), 992-996
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199909233411312
Abstract
The recent use of sham surgery in randomized, controlled trials raises three critical questions about research involving human subjects. The first question concerns the tension between the highest standard of research design and the highest standard of ethics.1 When these two standards come into conflict and researchers cannot simultaneously meet both, which should prevail, and how should a balance be struck? The second question points to ongoing uncertainties and disagreements in assessing the risks and benefits of research protocols. When reasonable people — the members of well-established institutional review boards or the sponsors of research — disagree in their risk–benefit . . .Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- The placebo is not dead: three historical vignettes.Ethics & Human Research, 1998
- Ethical Complexities of Conducting Research in Developing CountriesThe New England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- Unethical Trials of Interventions to Reduce Perinatal Transmission of the Human Immunodeficiency Virus in Developing CountriesThe New England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- The Ethics of Clinical Research in the Third WorldThe New England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- Guidelines for the use of placebo controls in clinical trials of psychopharmacologic agents. Loma Linda University Institutional Review BoardPsychiatric Services, 1996
- Placebo Orthodoxy in Clinical Research II: Ethical, Legal, and Regulatory MythsThe Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 1996
- Placebo Orthodoxy in Clinical Research I: Empirical and Methodological MythsThe Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 1996
- The Continuing Unethical Use of Placebo ControlsThe New England Journal of Medicine, 1994
- SCIENTIFIC AND ETHICAL ISSUES IN THE USE OF PLACEBO CONTROLS IN CLINICAL TRIALSAnnual Review of Public Health, 1994
- An Evaluation of Internal-Mammary-Artery Ligation by a Double-Blind TechnicThe New England Journal of Medicine, 1959