Randomized clinical trial comparing surgery, endovenous laser ablation and ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy for the treatment of great saphenous varicose veins
Open Access
- 26 August 2016
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in British Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 103 (11), 1438-1444
- https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10260
Abstract
Background Endovenous ablation techniques and ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy (UGFS) have largely replaced open surgery for treatment of great saphenous varicose veins. This was a randomized trial to compare the effect of surgery, endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) (with phlebectomies) and UGFS on quality of life and the occlusion rate of the great saphenous vein (GSV) 12 months after surgery. Methods Patients with symptomatic, uncomplicated varicose veins (CEAP class C2–C4) were examined at baseline, 1 month and 1 year. Before discharge and at 1 week, patients reported a pain score on a visual analogue scale. Preoperative and 1-year assessments included duplex ultrasound imaging and the Aberdeen Varicose Vein Severity Score (AVVSS). Results The study included 214 patients: 65 had surgery, 73 had EVLA and 76 had UGFS. At 1 year, the GSV was occluded or absent in 59 (97 per cent) of 61 patients after surgery, 71 (97 per cent) of 73 after EVLA and 37 (51 per cent) of 72 after UGFS (P < 0·001). The AVVSS improved significantly in comparison with preoperative values in all groups, with no significant differences between them. Perioperative pain was significantly reduced and sick leave shorter after UGFS (mean 1 day) than after EVLA (8 days) and surgery (12 days). Conclusion In comparison with open surgery and EVLA, UGFS resulted in equivalent improvement in quality of life but significantly higher residual GSV reflux at 12-month follow-up.This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Five-year results of a randomized clinical trial of conventional surgery, endovenous laser ablation and ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy in patients with great saphenous varicose veinsBritish Journal of Surgery, 2015
- A Randomized Trial Comparing Treatments for Varicose VeinsThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2014
- Endovenous ablation (radiofrequency and laser) and foam sclerotherapy versus open surgery for great saphenous vein varicesEmergencias, 2014
- Compression Therapy Versus Surgery in the Treatment of Patients with Varicose Veins: A RCTEuropean Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 2014
- Comparing endovenous laser ablation, foam sclerotherapy, and conventional surgery for great saphenous varicose veinsJournal of Vascular Surgery, 2013
- Randomized clinical trial of ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy versus surgery for the incompetent great saphenous veinBritish Journal of Surgery, 2012
- Randomized clinical trial comparing endovenous laser ablation, radiofrequency ablation, foam sclerotherapy and surgical stripping for great saphenous varicose veinsBritish Journal of Surgery, 2011
- Randomized trial comparing endovenous laser ablation of the great saphenous vein with high ligation and stripping in patients with varicose veins: Short-term resultsJournal of Vascular Surgery, 2007
- Prospective randomized study of endovenous radiofrequency obliteration (closure procedure) versus ligation and stripping in a selected patient population (EVOLVeS Study)Journal of Vascular Surgery, 2003
- Endovenous obliteration versus conventional stripping operation in the treatment of primary varicose veins: A randomized controlled trial with comparison of the costsJournal of Vascular Surgery, 2002