Five-year results of a randomized clinical trial of conventional surgery, endovenous laser ablation and ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy in patients with great saphenous varicose veins
- 1 July 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in British Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 102 (10), 1184-1194
- https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9867
Abstract
Background A variety of techniques exist for the treatment of patients with great saphenous vein (GSV) varicosities. Few data exist on the long-term outcomes of these interventions. Methods Patients undergoing conventional surgery, endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) and ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy (UGFS) for GSV varicose veins were followed up for 5 years. Primary outcome was obliteration or absence of the treated GSV segment; secondary outcomes were absence of GSV reflux, and change in Chronic Venous Insufficiency quality-of-life Questionnaire (CIVIQ) and EuroQol – 5D (EQ-5D™) scores. Results A total of 224 legs were included (69 conventional surgery, 78 EVLA, 77 UGFS), 193 (86·2 per cent) of which were evaluated at final follow-up. At 5 years, Kaplan–Meier estimates of obliteration or absence of the GSV were 85 (95 per cent c.i. 75 to 92), 77 (66 to 86) and 23 (14 to 33) per cent in the conventional surgery, EVLA and UGFS groups respectively. Absence of above-knee GSV reflux was found in 85 (73 to 92), 82 (72 to 90) and 41 (30 to 53) per cent respectively. CIVIQ scores deteriorated over time in patients in the UGFS group (0·98 increase per year, 95 per cent c.i. 0·16 to 1·79), and were significantly worse than those in the EVLA group (−0·44 decrease per year, 95 per cent c.i. −1·22 to 0·35) (P = 0·013). CIVIQ scores for the conventional surgery group did not differ from those in the EVLA and UGFS groups (0·44 increase per year, 95 per cent c.i. −0·41 to 1·29). EQ-5D™ scores improved equally in all groups. Conclusion EVLA and conventional surgery were more effective than UGFS in obliterating the GSV 5 years after intervention. UGFS was associated with substantial rates of GSV reflux and inferior CIVIQ scores compared with EVLA and conventional surgery. Registration number: NCT00529672 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Five-year results from the prospective European multicentre cohort study on radiofrequency segmental thermal ablation for incompetent great saphenous veinsBritish Journal of Surgery, 2015
- Comparing endovenous laser ablation, foam sclerotherapy, and conventional surgery for great saphenous varicose veinsJournal of Vascular Surgery, 2013
- Randomized clinical trial comparing endovenous laser ablation and stripping of the great saphenous vein with clinical and duplex outcome after 5 yearsJournal of Vascular Surgery, 2013
- Long-term results of a randomized controlled trial on ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy combined with saphenofemoral ligation vs standard surgery for varicose veinsJournal of Vascular Surgery, 2012
- Duplex Ultrasound Investigation of the Veins of the Lower Limbs after Treatment for Varicose Veins – UIP Consensus DocumentEuropean Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 2011
- Five-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing endovenous laser ablation with cryostripping for great saphenous varicose veinsBritish Journal of Surgery, 2011
- The care of patients with varicose veins and associated chronic venous diseases: Clinical practice guidelines of the Society for Vascular Surgery and the American Venous ForumJournal of Vascular Surgery, 2011
- Revision of the CEAP classification for chronic venous disorders: Consensus statementJournal of Vascular Surgery, 2004
- Recurrent Varicose Veins: Incidence, Risk Factors and Groin AnatomyEuropean Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 2004
- Construction and validation of a quality of life questionnaire in Chronic Lower Limb Venous Insufficiency (CIVIQ)Quality of Life Research, 1996