Impact of Changes in Clinical Practice Guidelines on Assessment of Quality of Care
- 1 August 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Medical Care
- Vol. 48 (8), 733-738
- https://doi.org/10.1097/mlr.0b013e3181e35b3a
Abstract
Measures for pay-for-performance and public reporting programs may be based on clinical practice guidelines. The impact of guideline changes over time-and whether evolving clinical evidence can render measures based on prior guidelines misleading-is not known. To assess the impact of using different percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) guidelines when evaluating whether PCI was indicated. PCIs from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry's CathPCI registry performed in 2003-2004 were categorized into indication classes (Class I, IIa, IIb, III), using 2001 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines for PCI, the guidelines available at the time of the procedures. The same procedures were recategorized using 2005 guidelines, which reflect the best evidence available to clinicians at the time of PCI. Procedures unable to be categorized were labeled as "Not Certain." Patients undergoing PCI for stable or unstable angina in 394 hospitals. Number of procedures changing classification categories using 2001 versus 2005 guidelines. A total of 345,779 PCIs were evaluated. Applying 2001 guidelines, 47.9% had Class I indications; 33.3% Class IIa; 5.9% Class IIb; 3.7% Class III; and 9.2% Not Certain. Applying 2005 guidelines to the same procedures, 25.1% had Class I indications; 57.5% Class IIa; 5.5% Class IIb; 3.7% Class III; and 8.3% Not Certain; 41.1% of procedures changed the classification overall. The changes in guidelines resulted in a marked shift in whether PCIs done in 2003-2004 were considered indicated. Guideline-based performance measures should be carefully evaluated before implementation to avoid incorrect assessments of quality of care.Keywords
This publication has 41 references indexed in Scilit:
- Temporal Changes in the Use of Drug-Eluting Stents for Patients With Non–ST-Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention From 2006 to 2008Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, 2009
- Impact of NICE guidance on rates of haemorrhage after tonsillectomy: an evaluation of guidance issued during an ongoing national tonsillectomy auditQuality and Safety in Health Care, 2008
- The association between guideline-based treatment instructions at the point of discharge and lower 1-year mortality in Medicare patients after acute myocardial infarction: The American College of Cardiology's Guidelines Applied in Practice (GAP) initiative in MichiganAmerican Heart Journal, 2007
- Effect of the implementation of NICE guidelines for ultrasound guidance on the complication rates associated with central venous catheter placement in patients presenting for routine surgery in a tertiary referral centreBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 2007
- Pay-for-PerformanceJama-Journal Of The American Medical Association, 2007
- A behavioral model of clinician responses to incentives to improve qualityHealth Policy, 2007
- Association Between Hospital Process Performance and Outcomes Among Patients With Acute Coronary SyndromesJama-Journal Of The American Medical Association, 2006
- Guideline-Based Standardized Care Is Associated With Substantially Lower Mortality in Medicare Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: The American College of Cardiology’s Guidelines Applied in Practice (GAP) Projects in MichiganJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2005
- Linking Physicians' Pay to the Quality of Care — A Major Experiment in the United KingdomThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- Clinical guidelines: Developing guidelinesBMJ, 1999