Pitfalls of toxicological investigations in hair, bones, and nails in extensively decomposed bodies: illustration with two cases
- 1 July 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in International journal of legal medicine
- Vol. 134 (4), 1339-1344
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-020-02267-3
Abstract
It is difficult to carry out toxicological investigations in biological samples collected from extensively decomposed bodies and to interpret obtained results as several pitfalls should be considered: redistribution phenomena, degradation of xenobiotics during the postmortem period, contamination by putrefaction fluids, and external contamination. This work aims to present two cases in order to illustrate and discuss these difficulties in this tricky situation. Case#1: the body of a 30-year-old woman was found in a wooded area (1 month after she has been reported missing by her family): hair and a femur section were sampled. Case#2: the decomposed corpse of a 52-year-old man was found in a ditch: hair and nails were sampled. After decontamination steps, toxicological investigations were performed using liquid chromatography with high-resolution mass spectrometry and tandem mass spectrometry detection methods. In case#1, the same drugs or metabolites (benzodiazepines, propranolol, tramadol, acetaminophen, paroxetine, and oxetorone) were detected in hair and in bone specimens. This result combination strongly suggests intakes close to the time of death for three of them (oxazepam, lormetazepam, and propranolol). In case#2, results of toxicological investigations in hair and nails [(hair/nail concentration in ng/mg) nordiazepam (1.12/1.06), oxazepam (0.113/0.042), zolpidem (0.211/< 0.01), hydroxyzine (0.362/< 0.01), and cetirizine (0.872/1.110)] were both consistent with several drug intakes but were not contributory to cause of death determination. In case of positive toxicological results in biological samples collected from extensively decomposed bodies (such as hair, bones, or nails), it is challenging to determine the time, and even more, the level of the dose of exposure(s).Keywords
This publication has 41 references indexed in Scilit:
- Results from hair testing in putrefied bodies should not be used to document long-term exposure to drugsToxicologie Analytique et Clinique, 2018
- High risk of misinterpreting hair analysis results for children tested for methadoneForensic Science International, 2017
- European guidelines for workplace drug and alcohol testing in hairDrug Testing and Analysis, 2016
- Drugs Involved in Drug-Facilitated Crimes (DFC)Published by Elsevier BV ,2014
- Society of Hair Testing guidelines for drug testing in hairForensic Science International, 2012
- Segmental hair analysis can demonstrate external contamination in postmortem casesForensic Science International, 2012
- Hair testing is taking rootAnnals of Clinical Biochemistry: International Journal of Laboratory Medicine, 2011
- External post mortem artefact: a key issue in hair result interpretationAnnales de Toxicologie Analytique, 2008
- Challenges in forensic toxicology of skeletonised human remainsThe Analyst, 2006
- Preanalytic aspects in postmortem toxicologyForensic Science International, 2004