Challenges in forensic toxicology of skeletonised human remains
- 20 July 2006
- journal article
- forum
- Published by Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC) in The Analyst
- Vol. 131 (9), 961-965
- https://doi.org/10.1039/b609130j
Abstract
Forensic toxicologists typically work with body fluids such as blood or urine, as well as visceral tissues such as liver. Very little work has been done to properly understand the utility of drug concentrations in bone tissue in a toxicologic examination. Literature reports suggest that detection of selected drugs in bone tissues is possible, but challenging work remains to determine the implications of bone tissue drug concentration measurements with respect to timelines of drug ingestion and deposition into bone, tissue sampling and sensitivity requirements, and environmental effects on measurements and their interpretation.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Postmortem Tissue Distribution of Olanzapine and Citalopram in a Drug IntoxicationJournal of Forensic Sciences, 2005
- Postmortem Distribution of Heroin Metabolites in Femoral Blood, Liver, Cerebrospinal Fluid, and Vitreous Humor*Journal of Analytical Toxicology, 2004
- Post-Mortem Drug Analyses in Bone and Bone MarrowTherapeutic Drug Monitoring, 2000
- Putrefactive Pleural Effusions as an Alternative Sample for Drug QuantificationAmerican Journal of Forensic Medicine & Pathology, 1999
- Detection of triazolam in skeletal remains buried for 4 yearsInternational journal of legal medicine, 1997
- Mechanisms of drug incorporation into hairForensic Science International, 1993
- Plasma versus bone marrow desipramine: A comparative studyForensic Science International, 1990
- Vitreous Humor in the Evaluation of Postmortem Blood Ethanol Concentrations*Journal of Analytical Toxicology, 1990
- Blood, bone marrow and eye fluid ethanol concentrations in putrefied rabbitsForensic Science International, 1983
- Plasma versus bone marrow flurazepam concentration in rabbitsForensic Science International, 1982