Primary closure versus T-tube drainage after common bile duct exploration for choledocholithiasis
- 27 June 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Langenbecks Archiv für Chirurgie
- Vol. 396 (1), 53-62
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-010-0660-z
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the benefits and harms of primary closure versus T-tube drainage after common bile duct (CBD) exploration for choledocholithiasis.This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- A randomized comparison of primary closure and T-tube drainage of the common bile duct after laparoscopic choledochotomySurgical Endoscopy, 2008
- Primary closure of the common bile duct in open laparotomy for common bile duct stonesJournal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, 2006
- Feasibility of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in a rural centreAnz Journal of Surgery, 2004
- Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct ExplorationJournal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques, 2001
- Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statementBritish Journal of Surgery, 2000
- Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?Controlled Clinical Trials, 1996
- Operative choledochoscopy in patients with acute cholangitis: A prospective, randomized studyBritish Journal of Surgery, 1991
- COMMON DUCT EXPLORATION OR ENDOSCOPIC SPHINCTEROTOMY FOR CHOLEDOCHOLITHIASIS?Anz Journal of Surgery, 1989
- Non-operative removal of bile duct stones by duodenoscopic sphincterotomyBritish Journal of Surgery, 1980
- Observations on Some Additional Cases Illustrating Hepatic SurgeryBMJ, 1889