Opening Thoughts
- 1 April 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Evaluation
- Vol. 7 (2), 155-163
- https://doi.org/10.1177/13563890122209595
Abstract
Today many disciplines including organization and management, public administration, social psychology, educational research and political science are becoming interested in dialogue. Evaluators are only just beginning to recognize how valuable dialogue can be for their work. Dialogue may have the potential to improve the democratic quality of decision making and judgement in postmodern societies and enhance (mutual) understanding between people. In this special issue we aim to disentangle some of the complexities, meanings and aims of dialogue and dialogical evaluation. A number of evaluation scholars and practitioners will discuss different notions of the concept and its relevance for evaluation practice. They will also deal with some practical considerations: what are the essential characteristics of evaluation dialogue; who should participate and what should the role and responsibility of evaluators be. We will also identify areas where we think caution should be exercised. Examples of dialogical evaluation projects in various policy settings and countries – including Sweden, Holland and the USA – together with comments by other scholars are meant to stimulate an exchange of ideas.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- On DialoguePublished by Informa UK Limited ,2013
- Evaluative Inquiry for Learning in OrganizationsPublished by SAGE Publications ,1999
- Values in Evaluation and Social ResearchPublished by SAGE Publications ,1999
- Relational Responsibility: Resources for Sustainable DialoguePublished by SAGE Publications ,1999
- Text in an Evaluative ContextEvaluation, 1998
- Evaluation as Practical HermeneuticsEvaluation, 1997
- Playing With/In PluralityEvaluation, 1997
- A Critical Dialogue in EvaluationEvaluation, 1996
- Participatory Evaluation of Development AssistanceEvaluation, 1996
- Beyond TechniqueEvaluation, 1995