Evaluation as Practical Hermeneutics
- 1 January 1997
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Evaluation
- Vol. 3 (1), 69-83
- https://doi.org/10.1177/135638909700300105
Abstract
This paper challenges the view that the 'general logic' or 'logic of evaluation' is foundational for understanding what it means to do 'good' evaluation. It attempts to show that the general logic is indexed to the modernist paradigm of reason and that evaluation practice can be alternatively indexed to the discourse of practical hermeneutics. The paper aims to advance our understanding of practical hermeneutics by explaining several of its salient assumptions. It offers several suggestions for redefining evaluation as a dialogical as opposed to a monological practice.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Developing Critical EvaluationEvaluation, 1996
- The logic of evaluation and evaluation practiceNew Directions for Evaluation, 1995
- Establishing evaluative conclusions: A distinction between general and working logicNew Directions for Evaluation, 1995
- Putting things together coherently: Logic and justiceNew Directions for Evaluation, 1995
- Need-based evaluation theory: What do you need to know to do good evaluation?Evaluation Practice, 1994
- Clarifying the merits of argument in evaluation practiceEvaluation and Program Planning, 1993
- The Beleaguered Rulers: The Public Obligation of the ProfessionalKennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 1992
- What Can She Know?Published by Cornell University Press ,1991
- Problems of Dostoevsky's PoeticsPublished by University of Minnesota Press ,1984
- 14. Believing in Social Science: The Ethics and Epistemology of Public Opinion ResearchPublished by Columbia University Press ,1983