David vs. Goliath: An Analysis of Asymmetric Mixed-Strategy Games and Experimental Evidence
- 1 August 2002
- journal article
- Published by Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS) in Management Science
- Vol. 48 (8), 972-991
- https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.48.8.972.165
Abstract
Mixed strategies are widely used to model strategic situations in diverse fields such as economics, marketing, political science, and biology. However, some of the implications of asymmetric mixed-strategy solutions are counterintuitive. We develop a stylized model of patent race to examine some of these implications. In our model two firms compete to develop a product and obtain a patent. However, one firm values the patent more because of its market advantages, such as brand reputation and distribution network. Contrary to some intuition, we find that the firm that values the patent less is likely to invest more aggressively in developing the product and will also win the patent more often. We argue that the reason for these counterintuitive results is inherent in the very concept of mixed strategy solution. In a laboratory test, we examine whether subjects' behavior conforms to the equilibrium predictions. We find that the aggregate behavior of our subjects is consistent with the game-theoretic predictions. With the help of the experience-weighted attraction (EWA) learning model proposed by Camerer and Ho (1999), we show that adaptive learning can account for the investment behavior of our subjects.We find that the EWA learning model tracks the investment decisions of our subjects well, whether we hold out trials or an entire group of subjects.This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Control of Technology Alliances: An Empirical Analysis of the Biotechnology IndustryJournal of Industrial Economics, 1998
- Market Segmentation and the Sources of Rents from Innovation: Personal Computers in the Late 1980sThe RAND Journal of Economics, 1997
- Models of Competitive Price Promotions: Some Empirical Evidence from the Coffee and Saltine Crackers MarketsJournal of Economics & Management Strategy, 1995
- Competition Over Price and Service Rate When Demand is Stochastic: A Strategic AnalysisThe RAND Journal of Economics, 1995
- Pioneer Advantage: Marketing Logic or Marketing Legend?Journal of Marketing Research, 1993
- Testing the Minimax Hypothesis: A Re-Examination of O'Neill's Game ExperimentEconometrica, 1990
- Coordination Through Committees and MarketsThe RAND Journal of Economics, 1988
- MARKETS AS ECONOMIZERS OF INFORMATION: EXPERIMENTAL EXAMINATION OF THE “HAYEK HYPOTHESIS”Economic Inquiry, 1982
- Sequences of Games with Varying OpponentsEconometrica, 1979
- Games with randomly disturbed payoffs: A new rationale for mixed-strategy equilibrium pointsInternational Journal of Game Theory, 1973