A Logical Framework for Forensic DNA Interpretation
Open Access
- 27 May 2022
- Vol. 13 (6), 957
- https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13060957
Abstract
The forensic community has devoted much effort over the last decades to the development of a logical framework for forensic interpretation, which is essential for the safe administration of justice. We review the research and guidelines that have been published and provide examples of how to implement them in casework. After a discussion on uncertainty in the criminal trial and the roles that the DNA scientist may take, we present the principles of interpretation for evaluative reporting. We show how their application helps to avoid a common fallacy and present strategies that DNA scientists can apply so that they do not transpose the conditional. We then discuss the hierarchy of propositions and explain why it is considered a fundamental concept for the evaluation of biological results and the differences between assessing results given propositions that are at the source level or the activity level. We show the importance of pre-assessment, especially when the questions relate to the alleged activities, and when transfer and persistence need to be considered by the scientists to guide the court. We conclude with a discussion on statement writing and testimony. This provides guidance on how DNA scientists can report in a balanced, transparent, and logical way.This publication has 49 references indexed in Scilit:
- Scale of conclusions for the value of evidenceLaw, Probability and Risk, 2011
- Evidence evaluation: A response to the court of appeal judgment in R v TScience & Justice, 2011
- Standards for the formulation of evaluative forensic science expert opinionScience & Justice, 2009
- The nature of forensic science opinion—a possible framework to guide thinking and practicce in investigation and in court proceedingsScience & Justice, 2006
- The scientist and the Scales of JusticeScience & Justice, 2000
- More on the hierarchy of propositions: exploring the distinction between explanations and propositionsScience & Justice, 2000
- A hierarchy of propositions: deciding which level to address in caseworkScience & Justice, 1998
- A model for case assessment and interpretationScience & Justice, 1998
- Avoiding the transposed conditionalScience & Justice, 1995
- Interpretation of statistical evidence in criminal trials: The prosecutor's fallacy and the defense attorney's fallacy.Law and Human Behavior, 1987