Interpretation of statistical evidence in criminal trials: The prosecutor's fallacy and the defense attorney's fallacy.
- 1 January 1987
- journal article
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Law and Human Behavior
- Vol. 11 (3), 167-187
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01044641
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Soil comparison by the density gradient method — A review and evaluationForensic Science International, 1983
- Diagnosticity and pseudodiagnosticity.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1983
- The Presentation of Bayesian Statistical Analyses in Legal ProceedingsJournal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series D (The Statistician), 1983
- The base-rate fallacy in probability judgmentsActa Psychologica, 1980
- PseudodiagnosticityActa Psychologica, 1979
- The Probative Value of Bloodstains on ClothingMedicine, Science and the Law, 1978
- Review: Quantitative Methods and Legal DecisionsThe University of Chicago Law Review, 1978
- The Probable and The ProvablePublished by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,1977
- A Survey of Men's FootwearJournal of the Forensic Science Society, 1977
- Response bias explanation of conservative human inference.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1970