A Defective Auxiliary in Danish
- 11 August 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Journal of Germanic Linguistics
- Vol. 23 (3), 245-298
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s1470542711000043
Abstract
In English, auxiliaries form a cohesive category—unlike main verbs, they all raise to T. In Danish, it is not so obvious that auxiliaries form such a unified category. In root clauses, all verbal elements can raise to T (and then to C), while in embedded clauses they always stay in situ. Therefore, determining the position of a verbal element in the extended verbal projection is a challenging task. We examine the Danish verbal elementg⊘re‘do’ that shows up when the verb phrase has been topicalized, elided, or pronominalized. Even though on the surfaceg⊘remight appear to be of category T or v, we argue that it is located right in the middle. We argue that it is an auxiliary, but, unlike other auxiliaries,g⊘reis defective because it only subcategorizes for vPs that are pronominal.*Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Ellipsis in Farsi Complex PredicatesSyntax, 2009
- Causation, Obligation, and Argument Structure: On the Nature of Little vLinguistic Inquiry, 2007
- Determinants of event type in Persian complex predicatesLingua, 2005
- Focus and topic in VP-anaphora constructionsLinguistics, 2000
- Describing Morphosyntax: A Guide for Field LinguistsLanguage, 1999
- Verb Movement and Expletive Subjects in the Germanic LanguagesLanguage, 1998
- Ellipsis: Functional Heads, Licensing, and IdentificationLanguage, 1996
- Sluicing and logical formNatural Language Semantics, 1995
- The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain BrombergerLanguage, 1994
- Anaphora in Generative GrammarLanguage, 1981