Causation, Obligation, and Argument Structure: On the Nature of Little v
- 1 March 2007
- journal article
- Published by MIT Press in Linguistic Inquiry
- Vol. 38 (2), 197-238
- https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2007.38.2.197
Abstract
As shown by Kayne (1975), Romance causatives with faire fall into two classes, faire infinitif (FI) and faire par (FP). We argue from Italian data that the properties of the two classes depend on the nature of the complement of fare:FI embeds a vP, FP a nominalized VP. The syntactic and semantic characteristics of these complements account straightforwardly for well-known differences between FI and FP, including the previously untreated “obligation” requirement in FI, absent in FP. Our analysis also accounts for another subtle restriction on the formation of FP: the existence of an animacy requirement on the subject of fare, absent in FI. Finally, we argue that only FP can undergo passivization; this accounts for a previously unobserved asymmetry in passivizability of causatives of unergative and unaccusative intransitive verbs.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- On the licensing of causatives of directed motion: Waltzing Matilda all over*Studia Linguistica, 2006
- New views on reflexivity: Delay effects in RomanceProbus, 2005
- On the Structure of Resultative Participles in EnglishLinguistic Inquiry, 2004
- Event paths, conflation, argument structure, and VP shellsLinguistics, 2004
- Lethal AmbiguityLinguistic Inquiry, 2004
- Possession and the double object constructionLinguistic Variation Yearbook, 2002
- The Theta System – an overviewTheoretical Linguistics, 2002
- On Feature Strength: Three Minimalist Approaches to Overt MovementLinguistic Inquiry, 1999
- Locative Inversion and the Architecture of Universal GrammarLanguage, 1994
- UNERGATIVES AS COPULAR VERBS; LOCATIONAL AND EXISTENTIAL PREDICATIONThe Linguistic Review, 1990