Alternative Methods of Accounting for Underreporting and Overreporting When Measuring Dietary Intake-Obesity Relations
Open Access
- 17 January 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in American Journal of Epidemiology
- Vol. 173 (4), 448-458
- https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwq380
Abstract
Misreporting characterized by the reporting of implausible energy intakes may undermine the valid estimation of diet-disease relations, but the methods to best identify and account for misreporting are unknown. The present study compared how alternate approaches affected associations between selected dietary factors and body mass index (BMI) by using data from the European Prospective Investigation Into Cancer and Nutrition-Spain. A total of 24,332 women and 15,061 men 29–65 years of age recruited from 1992 to 1996 for whom measured height and weight and validated diet history data were available were included. Misreporters were identified on the basis of disparities between reported energy intakes and estimated requirements calculated using the original Goldberg method and 2 alternatives: one that substituted basal metabolic rate equations that are more valid at higher BMIs and another that used doubly labeled water-predicted total energy expenditure equations. Compared with results obtained using the original method, underreporting was considerably lower and overreporting higher with alternative methods, which were highly concordant. Accounting for misreporters with all methods yielded diet-BMI relations that were more consistent with expectations; alternative methods often strengthened associations. For example, among women, multivariable-adjusted differences in BMI for the highest versus lowest vegetable intake tertile (β = 0.37 (standard error, 0.07)) were neutral after adjusting with the original method (β = 0.01 (standard error, 07)) and negative using the predicted total energy expenditure method with stringent cutoffs (β = −0.15 (standard error, 0.07)). Alternative methods may yield more valid associations between diet and obesity-related outcomes.Keywords
This publication has 42 references indexed in Scilit:
- Dietary Assessment and the Reliability of Nutritional Epidemiology Research ReportsJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2010
- Plant foods and plant-based diets: protective against childhood obesity?The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2009
- Biomarker-calibrated Energy and Protein Consumption and Increased Cancer Risk Among Postmenopausal WomenAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2009
- Obesity and the Mediterranean diet: a systematic review of observational and intervention studiesObesity Reviews, 2008
- Validity and repeatability of the EPIC physical activity questionnaire: a validation study using accelerometers as an objective measureInternational Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 2008
- Domestic Physical Activity in Relationship to Multiple CVD Risk FactorsAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2007
- What Epidemiologic Studies Tell Us about the Relationship between Fruit and Vegetable Consumption and Body WeightNutrition Reviews, 2004
- Evaluation of under- and overreporting of energy intake in the 24-hour diet recalls in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC)Public Health Nutrition, 2002
- Critical evaluation of energy intake using the Goldberg cut-off for energy intake:basal metabolic rate. A practical guide to its calculation, use and limitationsInternational Journal of Obesity, 2000
- Do we eat less fat, or just report so?International Journal of Obesity, 2000