Summarizing systematic reviews
Top Cited Papers
- 1 September 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in JBI Evidence Implementation
- Vol. 13 (3), 132-140
- https://doi.org/10.1097/xeb.0000000000000055
Abstract
Aims:With the increase in the number of systematic reviews available, a logical next step to provide decision makers in healthcare with the evidence they require has been the conduct of reviews of existing systematic reviews. Syntheses of existing systematic reviews are referred to by many different names, one of which is an umbrella review. An umbrella review allows the findings of reviews relevant to a review question to be compared and contrasted. An umbrella review's most characteristic feature is that this type of evidence synthesis only considers for inclusion the highest level of evidence, namely other systematic reviews and meta-analyses. A methodology working group was formed by the Joanna Briggs Institute to develop methodological guidance for the conduct of an umbrella review, including diverse types of evidence, both quantitative and qualitative. The aim of this study is to describe the development and guidance for the conduct of an umbrella review.Methods:Discussion and testing of the elements of methods for the conduct of an umbrella review were held over a 6-month period by members of a methodology working group. The working group comprised six participants who corresponded via teleconference, e-mail and face-to-face meeting during this development period. In October 2013, the methodology was presented in a workshop at the Joanna Briggs Institute Convention. Workshop participants, review authors and methodologists provided further testing, critique and feedback on the proposed methodology.Results:This study describes the methodology and methods developed for the conduct of an umbrella review that includes published systematic reviews and meta-analyses as the analytical unit of the review. Details are provided regarding the essential elements of an umbrella review, including presentation of the review question in a Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome format, nuances of the inclusion criteria and search strategy. A critical appraisal tool with 10 questions to help assess risk of bias in systematic reviews and meta-analyses was also developed and tested. Relevant details to extract from included reviews and how to best present the findings of both quantitative and qualitative systematic reviews in a reader friendly format are provided.Conclusions:Umbrella reviews provide a ready means for decision makers in healthcare to gain a clear understanding of a broad topic area. The umbrella review methodology described here is the first to consider reviews that report other than quantitative evidence derived from randomized controlled trials. The methodology includes an easy to use and informative summary of evidence table to readily provide decision makers with the available, highest level of evidence relevant to the question posed.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Systematic ReviewThe American Journal of Nursing, 2014
- Improving quality of care for persons with diabetes: an overview of systematic reviews - what does the evidence tell us?Systematic Reviews, 2013
- A Descriptive Analysis of Overviews of Reviews Published between 2000 and 2011PLOS ONE, 2012
- Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approachSystematic Reviews, 2012
- Beta2-agonists for acute bronchitisPublished by Wiley ,2011
- Methodology in conducting a systematic review of systematic reviews of healthcare interventionsBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2011
- Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up?PLoS Medicine, 2010
- A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologiesHealth Information and Libraries Journal, 2009
- Management of Aggression Among Demented or Brain-Injured PatientsClinical Nursing Research, 2009
- Physical activity programs for persons with dementiaPublished by Wiley ,2007