Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approach
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 10 February 2012
- journal article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Systematic Reviews
- Vol. 1 (1), 10
- https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-1-10
Abstract
Background: Rapid reviews have emerged as a streamlined approach to synthesizing evidence - typically for informing emergent decisions faced by decision makers in health care settings. Although there is growing use of rapid review 'methods', and proliferation of rapid review products, there is a dearth of published literature on rapid review methodology. This paper outlines our experience with rapidly producing, publishing and disseminating evidence summaries in the context of our Knowledge to Action (KTA) research program. Methods: The KTA research program is a two-year project designed to develop and assess the impact of a regional knowledge infrastructure that supports evidence-informed decision making by regional managers and stakeholders. As part of this program, we have developed evidence summaries - our form of rapid review - which have come to be a flagship component of this project. Our eight-step approach for producing evidence summaries has been developed iteratively, based on evidence (where available), experience and knowledge user feedback. The aim of our evidence summary approach is to deliver quality evidence that is both timely and user-friendly. Results: From November 2009 to March 2011 we have produced 11 evidence summaries on a diverse range of questions identified by our knowledge users. Topic areas have included questions of clinical effectiveness to questions on health systems and/or health services. Knowledge users have reported evidence summaries to be of high value in informing their decisions and initiatives. We continue to experiment with incorporating more of the established methods of systematic reviews, while maintaining our capacity to deliver a final product in a timely manner. Conclusions: The evolution of the KTA rapid review evidence summaries has been a positive one. We have developed an approach that appears to be addressing a need by knowledge users for timely, user-friendly, and trustworthy evidence and have transparently reported these methods here for the wider rapid review and scientific community.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Searches for evidence mapping: effective, shorter, cheaperJournal of the Medical Library Association, 2011
- Expediting systematic reviews: methods and implications of rapid reviewsImplementation Science, 2010
- Rapid-Acting Insulin Analogues for the Treatment of Diabetes Mellitus: Meta-analyses of Clinical Outcomes.2010
- NICE lifts cost limit on drugs to improve access to end of life treatmentsBMJ, 2009
- RAPID VERSUS FULL SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS: VALIDITY IN CLINICAL PRACTICE?Anz Journal of Surgery, 2008
- Using Existing Systematic Reviews in Complex Systematic ReviewsAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2008
- Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic ReviewsPLoS Medicine, 2007
- Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviewsBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2007
- Method guidelines for Cochrane Musculoskeletal Group systematic reviews.2006
- Single data extraction generated more errors than double data extraction in systematic reviewsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2006