Gender Differences in Salary in a Recent Cohort of Early-Career Physician–Researchers
Top Cited Papers
- 1 November 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Academic Medicine
- Vol. 88 (11), 1689-1699
- https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0b013e3182a71519
Abstract
Purpose Studies have suggested that male physicians earn more than their female counterparts. The authors examined whether this disparity exists in a recently hired cohort. Method In 2010–2011, the authors surveyed recent recipients of National Institutes of Health (NIH) mentored career development (i.e., K08 or K23) awards, receiving responses from 1,275 (75% response rate). For the 1,012 physicians with academic positions in clinical specialties who reported salary, they constructed linear regression models of salary considering gender, age, race, marital status, parental status, additional doctoral degree, academic rank, years on faculty, specialty, institution type, region, institution NIH funding rank, K award type, K award funding institute, K award year, work hours, and research time. They evaluated the explanatory value of spousal employment status using Peters–Belson regression. Results Mean salary was $141,325 (95% confidence interval [CI] 135,607–147,043) for women and $172,164 (95% CI 167,357–176,971) for men. Male gender remained an independent, significant predictor of salary (+$10,921, P < .001) even after adjusting for specialty, academic rank, work hours, research time, and other factors. Peters–Belson analysis indicated that 17% of the overall disparity in the full sample was unexplained by the measured covariates. In the married subset, after accounting for spousal employment status, 10% remained unexplained. Conclusions The authors observed, in this recent cohort of elite, early-career physician–researchers, a gender difference in salary that was not fully explained by specialty, academic rank, work hours, or even spousal employment. Creating more equitable procedures for establishing salary is important.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Negotiation in Academic MedicineAcademic Medicine, 2013
- Normative Discrimination and the Motherhood PenaltyGender & Society, 2010
- Too Bad for the Women or Does It Have to Be? Gender and Negotiation Research over the Past Twenty‐Five YearsNegotiation Journal, 2009
- Women at the Bargaining Table: Pitfalls and ProspectsNegotiation Journal, 2009
- How Do Race And Sex Affect The Earnings Of Primary Care Physicians?Health Affairs, 2009
- Social incentives for gender differences in the propensity to initiate negotiations: Sometimes it does hurt to askOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2007
- Getting a Job: Is There a Motherhood Penalty?American Journal of Sociology, 2007
- Multimodel InferenceSociological Methods & Research, 2004
- Male-Female Wage Differentials in Urban Labor MarketsInternational Economic Review, 1973
- A Technique for Studying the Effects of a Television BroadcastJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C: Applied Statistics, 1956