Negotiation in Academic Medicine
Open Access
- 1 April 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Academic Medicine
- Vol. 88 (4), 505-511
- https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0b013e318286072b
Abstract
Few researchers have explored the negotiation experiences of academic medical faculty even though negotiation is crucial to their career success. The authors sought to understand medical faculty researchers' experiences with and perceptions of negotiation. Between February 2010 and August 2011, the authors conducted semi-structured, in-depth telephone interviews with 100 former recipients of National Institutes of Health mentored career development awards and 28 of their mentors. Purposive sampling ensured a diverse range of viewpoints. Multiple analysts thematically coded verbatim transcripts using qualitative data analysis software. Participants described the importance of negotiation in academic medical careers but also expressed feeling naïve and unprepared for these negotiations, particularly as junior faculty. Award recipients focused on power, leverage, and strategy, and they expressed a need for training and mentorship to learn successful negotiation skills. Mentors, by contrast, emphasized the importance of flexibility and shared interests in creating win-win situations for both the individual faculty member and the institution. When faculty construed negotiation as adversarial and/or zero-sum, participants believed it required traditionally masculine traits and perceived women to be at a disadvantage. Academic medical faculty often lack the skills and knowledge necessary for successful negotiation, especially early in their careers. Many view negotiation as an adversarial process of the sort that experts call “hard positional bargaining.” Increasing awareness of alternative negotiation techniques (e.g., “principled negotiation,” in which shared interests, mutually satisfying options, and fair standards are emphasized), may encourage the success of medical faculty, particularly women.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Batting 300 Is GoodAcademic Medicine, 2013
- Mentor Networks in Academic MedicineAcademic Medicine, 2013
- The $16,819 Pay Gap For Newly Trained Physicians: The Unexplained Trend Of Men Earning More Than WomenHealth Affairs, 2011
- The Effectiveness of Negotiation TrainingNegotiation Journal, 2008
- Gender in Job Negotiations: A Two‐Level GameNegotiation Journal, 2008
- Negotiating a career in academic gastroenterologyGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2006
- Using thematic analysis in psychologyQualitative Research in Psychology, 2006
- Battle of the sexes: Gender stereotype confirmation and reactance in negotiations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2001
- Women Physicians in Academic Medicine — New Insights from Cohort StudiesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2000
- GENDER DIFFERENCES IN NEGOTIATION OUTCOME: A META‐ANALYSISPersonnel Psychology, 1999