Understanding the processes that facilitate and hinder efforts to advance women in organizations
- 1 May 2005
- journal article
- Published by Emerald in Career Development International
- Vol. 10 (3), 190-202
- https://doi.org/10.1108/13620430510598319
Abstract
Purpose – Aims to look at the way women in Western industrialized countries have made significant career advancements but barriers remain which necessitate organizational intervention. A number of initiatives that have commonly been introduced to help women in their career development have produced only modest gains in women's advancement. Design/methodology/approach – Argues that four basic underlying processes – social cognitions, justice, threat, and utility – must be considered and managed as part of the development, implementation, and evaluation of initiatives targeting women's career advancement, if such initiatives are to have their desired impact. These underlying processes and their implications are presented with recommendations for organizational leaders and human resource professionals. Findings – The goal of women's advancement is both noble and vital to long-term organizational success, and initiatives to further the cause are needed. These goals are not, however, without their obstacles. By understanding how social cognitions, perceptions of fairness, threat, and utility can individually and collectively impact the success or failure of programs to advance women, organizational leaders can develop and implement informed practices that are embraced by all members of the organization and which, consequently, further the advancement of all organizational members. Originality/value – The article focuses on the key underlying processes that are believed to be critical for understanding the barriers to women's career advancement, but it is necessary to note that, as with any organizational initiative, there are other organizational factors that must be considered, such as top management support, and the history of the organization with regard to gender.Keywords
This publication has 43 references indexed in Scilit:
- Meta-Cognition about Biological Sex and Gender-Stereotypic Physical Appearance: Consequences for the Assessment of Leadership CompetencePersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2004
- Gender and Managerial Stereotypes: Have the Times Changed?Journal of Management, 2002
- The Leadership Styles of Women and MenJournal of Social Issues, 2001
- Procedural Fairness, Managers' Self-Esteem, and Managerial Behaviors Following a LayoffOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2000
- Reactions to two versions of affirmative action action among Whites, Blacks, and Hispanics.Journal of Applied Psychology, 2000
- Subtle Sexism: Current Practice and Prospects for ChangeContemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews, 1998
- Participation in the performance appraisal process and employee reactions: A meta-analytic review of field investigations.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1998
- Overt, Covert, And Subtle SexismPsychology of Women Quarterly, 1997
- Intentionally favored, unintentionally harmed? Impact of sex-based preferential selection on self-perceptions and self-evaluations.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1987
- A Taxonomy of Organizational Justice TheoriesAcademy of Management Review, 1987