Randomized clinical trial of donor-site wound dressings after split-skin grafting
- 24 January 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in British Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 100 (5), 619-627
- https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9045
Abstract
Background The aim was to study which dressing material was best for healing donor‐site wounds (DSWs) after split‐skin grafting as there is wide variation in existing methods, ranging from classical gauze dressings to modern silicone dressings. Methods This 14‐centre, six‐armed randomized clinical trial (stratified by centre) compared six wound dressing materials in adult patients with DSWs larger than 10 cm2. Primary outcomes were time to complete re‐epithelialization and pain scores measured on a visual analogue scale (VAS) over 4 weeks. Secondary outcomes included itching (VAS, over 4 weeks), adverse events and scarring after 12 weeks rated using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS). Results Between October 2009 and December 2011, 289 patients were randomized (of whom 288 were analysed) to either alginate (45), film (49), gauze (50), hydrocolloid (49), hydrofibre (47) or silicone (48) dressings. Time to complete re‐epithelialization using hydrocolloid dressings was 7 days shorter than when any other dressing was used (median 16 versus 23 days; P < 0·001). Overall pain scores were low, and slightly lower with use of film dressings (P = 0·038). The infection rate among patients treated with gauze was twice as high as in those who had other dressings (18 versus 7·6 per cent; relative risk 2·38, 95 per cent confidence interval 1·14 to 4·99). Patients who had a film dressing were least satisfied with overall scar quality. Conclusion This trial showed that use of hydrocolloid dressings led to the speediest healing of DSWs. Gauze dressing should be discontinued as they caused more infections. Registration number: NTR1849 ( http://www.trialregister.nl).Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Ideal Split-Thickness Skin Graft Donor-Site DressingPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2011
- Management of split-thickness skin graft donor site: A prospective clinical trial for comparison of five different dressing materialsBurns, 2010
- Management of split skin graft donor sites – results of a national surveyJournal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, 2009
- Systematic Review of Skin Graft Donor-Site DressingsPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2009
- Results of an Internet Survey on the Treatment of Partial Thickness Burns, Full Thickness Burns, and Donor SitesJournal of Burn Care & Research, 2007
- The use of moist wound‐healing dressings in the management of split‐thickness skin graft donor sites: a systematic reviewInternational Journal of Nursing Practice, 2003
- AUSTRALASIAN SURVEY OF SPLIT SKIN GRAFT DONOR SITE DRESSINGSAnz Journal of Surgery, 2000
- Split-thickness skin graft donor site care: a quantitative synthesis of the researchApplied Nursing Research, 1998
- Split-thickness skin graft donor sitesJournal of Wound Care, 1998
- Which Dressing for Split-Thickness Skin Graft Donor Sites?Annals of Plastic Surgery, 1991