Cognitive issues in fingerprint analysis: Inter- and intra-expert consistency and the effect of a ‘target’ comparison
- 1 May 2011
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Forensic Science International
- Vol. 208 (1-3), 10-17
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.10.013
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- The use of technology in human expert domains: challenges and risks arising from the use of automated fingerprint identification systems in forensic scienceLaw, Probability and Risk, 2010
- On the Preliminary Psychophysics of Fingerprint IdentificationThe Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2009
- Testing for Potential Contextual Bias Effects During the Verification Stage of the ACE‐V Methodology when Conducting Fingerprint Comparisons*Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2009
- Meta‐analytically Quantifying the Reliability and Biasability of Forensic ExpertsJournal of Forensic Sciences, 2008
- Contextual information renders experts vulnerable to making erroneous identificationsForensic Science International, 2006
- When emotions get the better of us: the effect of contextual top-down processing on matching fingerprintsApplied Cognitive Psychology, 2005
- The Application of Signal Detection Theory to Decision-Making in Forensic ScienceJournal of Forensic Sciences, 2001
- Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many GuisesReview of General Psychology, 1998
- Expert evidence and forensic misconceptions of the nature of exact scienceScience & Justice, 1996
- How often are our numbers wrong?American Psychologist, 1978