Testing for Potential Contextual Bias Effects During the Verification Stage of the ACE‐V Methodology when Conducting Fingerprint Comparisons*
- 21 April 2009
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Forensic Sciences
- Vol. 54 (3), 571-582
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.01025.x
Abstract
This study was conducted to assess if fingerprint specialists could be influenced by extraneous contextual information during a verification process. Participants were separated into three groups: a control group (no contextual information was given), a low bias group (minimal contextual information was given in the form of a report prompting conclusions), and a high bias group (an internationally recognized fingerprint expert provided conclusions and case information to deceive this group into believing that it was his case and conclusions). A similar experiment was later conducted with laypersons. The results showed that fingerprint experts were influenced by contextual information during fingerprint comparisons, but not towards making errors. Instead, fingerprint experts under the biasing conditions provided significantly fewer definitive and erroneous conclusions than the control group. In contrast, the novice participants were more influenced by the bias conditions and did tend to make incorrect judgments, especially when prompted towards an incorrect response by the bias prompt.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Meta‐analytically Quantifying the Reliability and Biasability of Forensic ExpertsJournal of Forensic Sciences, 2008
- Scientific validation of fingerprint evidence under DaubertLaw, Probability and Risk, 2007
- The potential (negative) influence of observational biases at the analysis stage of fingermark individualisationForensic Science International, 2007
- Contextual information renders experts vulnerable to making erroneous identificationsForensic Science International, 2006
- When emotions get the better of us: the effect of contextual top-down processing on matching fingerprintsApplied Cognitive Psychology, 2005
- The Daubert/Kumho Implications of Observer Effects in Forensic Science: Hidden Problems of Expectation and SuggestionCalifornia Law Review, 2002
- Writer Identification by Professional Document ExaminersJournal of Forensic Sciences, 1997
- Proficiency of Professional Document Examiners in Writer IdentificationJournal of Forensic Sciences, 1994
- Psychology of the Scientist: X. Observer Bias in Classical Conditioning of the PlanarianPsychological Reports, 1963