Tortured Bodies, Tortured Doctrines: Informed Consent as a Legal Fiction Inapplicable to Neonatal Male Circumcision
- 4 June 2013
- book chapter
- other
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- On remedicalisation: male circumcision in the United States and Great BritainSociology of Health & Illness, 2010
- Non-Consensual Treatment is (Nearly Always) Morally ImpermissibleThe Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2010
- Incidence of Meatal Stenosis following Neonatal Circumcision in a Primary Care SettingClinical Pediatrics, 2006
- Male Circumcision: Pain, Trauma and Psychosexual SequelaeJournal of Health Psychology, 2002
- Informed consent and other fairy storiesMedical Law Review, 1999
- Privileging the medical norm: liberalism, self-determination and refusal of treatmentLegal Studies, 1996
- Complications of circumcisionBritish Journal of Surgery, 1993
- A risk-specific anesthesia consent form may hinder the informed consent processJournal of Clinical Anesthesia, 1991
- Circumcision and Informed ConsentMedical Care, 1987
- Informed Consent — Why Are Its Goals Imperfectly Realized?The New England Journal of Medicine, 1980