Trial of Decompressive Craniectomy for Traumatic Intracranial Hypertension
Top Cited Papers
- 21 September 2016
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in The New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 375 (12), 1119-1130
- https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1605215
Abstract
BACKGROUND The effect of decompressive craniectomy on clinical outcomes in patients with refractory traumatic intracranial hypertension remains unclear. METHODS From 2004 through 2014, we randomly assigned 408 patients, 10 to 65 years of age, with traumatic brain injury and refractory elevated intracranial pressure (>25 mm Hg) to undergo decompressive craniectomy or receive ongoing medical care. The primary outcome was the rating on the Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS-E) (an 8-point scale, ranging from death to "upper good recovery" [no injury-related problems]) at 6 months. The primary-outcome measure was analyzed with an ordinal method based on the proportional-odds model. If the model was rejected, that would indicate a significant difference in the GOS-E distribution, and results would be reported descriptively. RESULTS The GOS-E distribution differed between the two groups (P<0.001). The proportional-odds assumption was rejected, and therefore results are reported descriptively. At 6 months, the GOS-E distributions were as follows: death, 26.9% among 201 patients in the surgical group versus 48.9% among 188 patients in the medical group; vegetative state, 8.5% versus 2.1%; lower severe disability (dependent on others for care), 21.9% versus 14.4%; upper severe disability (independent at home), 15.4% versus 8.0%; moderate disability, 23.4% versus 19.7%; and good recovery, 4.0% versus 6.9%. At 12 months, the GOS-E distributions were as follows: death, 30.4% among 194 surgical patients versus 52.0% among 179 medical patients; vegetative state, 6.2% versus 1.7%; lower severe disability, 18.0% versus 14.0%; upper severe disability, 13.4% versus 3.9%; moderate disability, 22.2% versus 20.1%; and good recovery, 9.8% versus 8.4%. Surgical patients had fewer hours than medical patients with intracranial pressure above 25 mm Hg after randomization (median, 5.0 vs. 17.0 hours; P<0.001) but had a higher rate of adverse events (16.3% vs. 9.2%, P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS At 6 months, decompressive craniectomy in patients with traumatic brain injury and refractory intracranial hypertension resulted in lower mortality and higher rates of vegetative state, lower severe disability, and upper severe disability than medical care. The rates of moderate disability and good recovery were similar in the two groups. (Funded by the Medical Research Council and others; RESCUEicp Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN66202560.)Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Intracranial pressure monitoring in severe traumatic brain injuryBMJ, 2013
- Mortality and long-term functional outcome associated with intracranial pressure after traumatic brain injuryIntensive Care Medicine, 2012
- Decompressive craniectomy — operative technique and perioperative careAdvances and technical standards in neurosurgery, 2012
- Decompressive Craniectomy in Diffuse Traumatic Brain InjuryThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2011
- The added value of ordinal analysis in clinical trials: an example in traumatic brain injuryCritical Care, 2011
- Observed versus Predicted Outcome for Decompressive Craniectomy: A Population-Based StudyJournal of Neurotrauma, 2010
- VIII. Intracranial Pressure ThresholdsJournal of Neurotrauma, 2007
- Impact of Intracranial Pressure and Cerebral Perfusion Pressure on Severe Disability and Mortality After Head InjuryNeurocritical Care, 2006
- Structured Interviews for the Glasgow Outcome Scale and the Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale: Guidelines for Their UseJournal of Neurotrauma, 1998
- Disability after severe head injury: observations on the use of the Glasgow Outcome Scale.Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 1981