The added value of ordinal analysis in clinical trials: an example in traumatic brain injury
Open Access
- 1 January 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Critical Care
- Vol. 15 (3), R127
- https://doi.org/10.1186/cc10240
Abstract
In clinical trials, ordinal outcome measures are often dichotomized into two categories. In traumatic brain injury (TBI) the 5-point Glasgow outcome scale (GOS) is collapsed into unfavourable versus favourable outcome. Simulation studies have shown that exploiting the ordinal nature of the GOS increases chances of detecting treatment effects. The objective of this study is to quantify the benefits of ordinal analysis in the real-life situation of a large TBI trial. We used data from the CRASH trial that investigated the efficacy of corticosteroids in TBI patients (n = 9,554). We applied two techniques for ordinal analysis: proportional odds analysis and the sliding dichotomy approach, where the GOS is dichotomized at different cut-offs according to baseline prognostic risk. These approaches were compared to dichotomous analysis. The information density in each analysis was indicated by a Wald statistic. All analyses were adjusted for baseline characteristics. Dichotomous analysis of the six-month GOS showed a non-significant treatment effect (OR = 1.09, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.21, P = 0.096). Ordinal analysis with proportional odds regression or sliding dichotomy showed highly statistically significant treatment effects (OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.25, P = 0.0007 and 1.19, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.30, P = 0.0002), with 2.05-fold and 2.56-fold higher information density compared to the dichotomous approach respectively. Analysis of the CRASH trial data confirmed that ordinal analysis of outcome substantially increases statistical power. We expect these results to hold for other fields of critical care medicine that use ordinal outcome measures and recommend that future trials adopt ordinal analyses. This will permit detection of smaller treatment effects.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- A simulation study evaluating approaches to the analysis of ordinal outcome data in randomized controlled trials in traumatic brain injury: results from the IMPACT ProjectClinical Trials, 2010
- Delta inflation: a bias in the design of randomized controlled trials in critical care medicineCritical Care, 2010
- Measurement in clinical trials: A neglected issue for statisticians?Statistics in Medicine, 2009
- Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: practical prognostic models based on large cohort of international patientsBMJ, 2008
- Novel End Point Analytic Techniques and Interpreting Shifts Across the Entire Range of Outcome Scales in Acute Stroke TrialsStroke, 2007
- Can We Improve the Statistical Analysis of Stroke Trials?Stroke, 2007
- Adjustment for Strong Predictors of Outcome in Traumatic Brain Injury Trials: 25% Reduction in Sample Size Requirements in the IMPACT StudyJournal of Neurotrauma, 2006
- The cost of dichotomising continuous variablesBMJ, 2006
- Design and Analysis of Phase III Trials with Ordered Outcome Scales: The Concept of the Sliding DichotomyJournal of Neurotrauma, 2005
- Clinical trials in acute myocardial infarction: Should we adjust for baseline characteristics?American Heart Journal, 2000