Basing information on comprehensive, critically appraised, and up-to-date syntheses of the scientific evidence: a quality dimension of the International Patient Decision Aid Standards
Open Access
- 29 November 2013
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
- Vol. 13 (S2), S5
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-13-s2-s5
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence—imprecisionJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2011
- GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence—inconsistencyJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2011
- GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidenceJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2011
- GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence—indirectnessJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2011
- GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence—publication biasJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2011
- GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence-study limitations (risk of bias)Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2011
- AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviewsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2009
- Progress in Evidence-Based MedicinePublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,2008
- GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendationsBMJ, 2008
- Renewing Professionalism in Medicine: The Physician CharterSpine, 2002