GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence—indirectness
Top Cited Papers
- 1 December 2011
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 64 (12), 1303-1310
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.04.014
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Methodological problems in the use of indirect comparisons for evaluating healthcare interventions: survey of published systematic reviewsBMJ, 2009
- Comparative efficacy and acceptability of 12 new-generation antidepressants: a multiple-treatments meta-analysisLancet, 2009
- Comparing non-vertebral fracture risk reduction with osteoporosis therapies: looking beneath the surfaceOsteoporosis International, 2008
- Progression-free survival as a surrogate endpoint in advanced breast cancer.International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 2008
- Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin vs Unfractionated Heparin for Perioperative Thromboprophylaxis in Patients With CancerA Systematic Review and Meta-analysisArchives of Internal Medicine, 2008
- WHO Rapid Advice Guidelines for pharmacological management of sporadic human infection with avian influenza A (H5N1) virusThe Lancet Infectious Diseases, 2007
- Simultaneous comparison of multiple treatments: combining direct and indirect evidenceBMJ, 2005
- Atorvastatin in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Undergoing HemodialysisThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2005
- External validity of randomised controlled trials: “To whom do the results of this trial apply?”The Lancet, 2005
- Indirect comparison meta-analysis of aspirin therapy after coronary surgeryBMJ, 2003