Percutaneous versus surgical closure of secundum atrial septal defects: a systematic review and meta-analysis of currently available clinical evidence
- 1 July 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Europa Digital & Publishing in EuroIntervention
- Vol. 7 (3), 377-385
- https://doi.org/10.4244/eijv7i3a63
Abstract
The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Percutaneous versus surgical closure of secundum atrial septal defect: Comparison of early results and complicationsAmerican Heart Journal, 2006
- Prospective comparison of costs and short term health outcomes of surgical versus device closure of atrial septal defect in childrenHeart, 2002
- Surgical and transcatheter (Amplatzer) closure of atrial septal defects: a prospective comparison of results and costHeart, 2002
- A Comparison of Surgical and Medical Therapy for Atrial Septal Defect in AdultsThe New England Journal of Medicine, 1995
- Peri-operative complications following surgical closure of atrial septal defect type II in 232 patients—a baseline studyEuropean Heart Journal, 1994
- Long-term follow-up (9 to 20 years) after surgical closure of atrial septal defect at a young ageThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1993
- Surgical treatment of adult atrial septal defect: Early and long-term resultsJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1992
- Long-Term Outcome after Surgical Repair of Isolated Atrial Septal DefectThe New England Journal of Medicine, 1990
- Congenital heart disease among 160 480 liveborn children in Liverpool 1960 to 1969. Implications for surgical treatment.Heart, 1981
- Secundum atrial septal defect. Nonoperative closure during cardiac catheterizationJAMA, 1976