Percutaneous versus surgical closure of secundum atrial septal defect: Comparison of early results and complications
Open Access
- 31 January 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in American Heart Journal
- Vol. 151 (1), 228-234
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2005.02.051
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Comparison of Observational Studies and Randomized, Controlled TrialsThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2000
- Comparison of results and complications of surgical and amplatzer device closure of atrial septal defectsThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1999
- Transcatheter closure as standard treatment for most interatrial defects: experience in 200 patients treated with the Amplatzer ™ Septal OccluderCardiology in the Young, 1999
- Transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect and patent foramen ovale with the ASDOS device (a multi-institutional European trial)The American Journal of Cardiology, 1998
- Long-term follow-up (9 to 20 years) after surgical closure of atrial septal defect at a young ageThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1993
- Echocardiographic estimation of balloon-stretched diameter of secundum atrial septal defect for transcatheter occlusionAmerican Heart Journal, 1992
- Transvenous atrial septal defect occlusion by the buttoned deviceThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1990
- Long-Term Outcome after Surgical Repair of Isolated Atrial Septal DefectThe New England Journal of Medicine, 1990
- Congenital heart disease among 160 480 liveborn children in Liverpool 1960 to 1969. Implications for surgical treatment.Heart, 1981
- Secundum atrial septal defect. Nonoperative closure during cardiac catheterizationJAMA, 1976