Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography or intervention and the impact on major bleeding and ischemic events: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials
- 31 January 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in American Heart Journal
- Vol. 157 (1), 132-140
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2008.08.023
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Association of the arterial access site at angioplasty with transfusion and mortality: the M.O.R.T.A.L study (Mortality benefit Of Reduced Transfusion after percutaneous coronary intervention via the Arm or Leg)Heart, 2008
- Randomised comparison of femoral versus radial approach for percutaneous coronary intervention using abciximab in acute myocardial infarction: results of the FARMI TrialHeart, 2006
- Adverse Impact of Bleeding on Prognosis in Patients With Acute Coronary SyndromesCirculation, 2006
- Impact of Bleeding Severity on Clinical Outcomes Among Patients With Acute Coronary SyndromesThe American Journal of Cardiology, 2005
- Radial versus femoral access for emergent percutaneous coronary intervention with adjunct glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition in acute myocardial infarction—the RADIAL-AMI pilot randomized trialAmerican Heart Journal, 2005
- Outpatient coronary angioplasty: Feasible and safeCatheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 2005
- Comparison of transradial and transfemoral approaches for coronary angiography and angioplasty in octogenarians (the OCTOPLUS study)The American Journal of Cardiology, 2004
- Randomized comparison of rapid ambulation using radial, 4 French femoral access, or femoral access with AngioSeal closureCatheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 2004
- Comparative study on transradial approach vs. transfemoral approach in primary stent implantation for patients with acute myocardial infarction: Results of the test for myocardial infarction by prospective unicenter randomization for access sites (TEMPURA) trialCatheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 2003
- Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?Controlled Clinical Trials, 1996