Gleason scoring: a comparison of classical and modified (International Society of Urological Pathology) criteria using nadir PSA as a clinical end point
- 1 June 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Pathology
- Vol. 42 (4), 339-343
- https://doi.org/10.3109/00313021003787924
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Comparison of the Prognostic Value of Early PSA Test-Based Variables Following External Beam Radiotherapy, With or Without Preceding Androgen Deprivation: Analysis of Data From the TROG 96.01 Randomized TrialInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 2011
- Gleason grading: consensus and controversyPathology, 2009
- Understanding the Epidemiology, Natural History, and Key Pathways Involved in Prostate CancerUrology, 2009
- Assuring high quality treatment delivery in clinical trials – Results from the Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (TROG) study 03.04 “RADAR” set-up accuracy studyRadiotherapy and Oncology, 2009
- Impact of reporting rules of biopsy Gleason score for prostate cancerJournal of Clinical Pathology, 2008
- Validation of Partin Tables and Development of a Preoperative Nomogram for Japanese Patients With Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer Using 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology Consensus on Gleason Grading: Data From the Clinicopathological Research Group for Localized Prostate CancerJournal of Urology, 2008
- The Impact of the 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology Consensus Conference on Standard Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma in Needle BiopsiesJournal of Urology, 2008
- Prostate cancer: the new evidence base for diagnosis and treatmentPathology, 2007
- The significance of modified Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma in biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimensVirchows Archiv A Pathological Anatomy and Histopathology, 2006
- Renal cell carcinoma II. Histological indicators of prognosisPathology, 1987