Gleason grading: consensus and controversy
- 1 December 2009
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Pathology
- Vol. 41 (7), 613-614
- https://doi.org/10.3109/00313020903308823
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Impact of reporting rules of biopsy Gleason score for prostate cancerJournal of Clinical Pathology, 2008
- The Impact of the 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology Consensus Conference on Standard Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma in Needle BiopsiesJournal of Urology, 2008
- Prostate cancer: the new evidence base for diagnosis and treatmentPathology, 2007
- The significance of modified Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma in biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimensVirchows Archiv, 2006
- The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic CarcinomaThe American Journal of Surgical Pathology, 2005
- Prognostic and predictive factors and reporting of prostate carcinoma in prostate needle biopsy specimensScandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology, 2005
- Prognostic factors and reporting of prostate carcinoma in radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy specimensScandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology, 2005
- Prediction of Prognosis for Prostatic Adenocarcinoma by Combined Histological Grading and Clinical StagingJournal of Urology, 1974