Different assessment tools for intensive care unit delirium: Which score to use?*
- 1 February 2010
- journal article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Critical Care Medicine
- Vol. 38 (2), 409-418
- https://doi.org/10.1097/ccm.0b013e3181cabb42
Abstract
To compare validity and reliability of three instruments for detection and assessment of delirium in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Delirium in critically ill patients is associated with higher mortality, prolonged duration of ICU stay, and greater healthcare costs. Currently, there are several assessment tools available for detection of delirium, but only a few of these assessment systems are developed specifically to screen for delirium in ICU patients. Prospective cohort study. ICU at a university hospital. A total of 156 surgical patients aged > or = 60 yrs consecutively admitted to the ICU, with a length of stay of at least 24 hrs. This study was approved by the institutional ethics committee. Trained staff members performed daily and independently the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU), the Nursing Delirium Screening Scale (Nu-DESC), and the Delirium Detection Score (DDS). These evaluations were compared against the reference standard conducted by a delirium expert (blinded to the study), who used delirium criteria from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV). Of 156 patients, 63 (40%) were identified as delirious by the reference standard during the study. Using the CAM-ICU and the Nu-DESC, we measured comparable sensitivities (CAM-ICU, 81%; Nu-DESC, 83%). The specificity of the CAM-ICU was significantly higher than that of the Nu-DESC (96% vs. 81%, p < .01). In contrast, the DDS showed poor sensitivity (30%), whereas the specificity was significantly higher compared with the Nu-DESC (DDS, 91%; Nu-DESC, 81%, p < .05). The interrater reliability was "almost perfect" for the CAM-ICU (kappa = 0.89) and "substantial" for DDS and Nu-DESC (kappa = 0.79, 0.68). The CAM-ICU showed the best validity of the evaluated scales to identify delirium in ICU patients. The Nu-DESC might be an alternative tool for detection of ICU delirium. The DDS should not be used as a screening tool.Keywords
This publication has 46 references indexed in Scilit:
- Die Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC) – Richtlinienkonforme Übersetzung und Validierung einer intensivmedizinischen Delirium–ChecklisteAINS - Anästhesiologie · Intensivmedizin · Notfallmedizin · Schmerztherapie, 2009
- Delirium is associated with early postoperative cognitive dysfunctionAnaesthesia, 2008
- The Confusion Assessment Method: A Systematic Review of Current UsageJournal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2008
- Delirium assessment in the intensive care unit: patient population mattersCritical Care, 2008
- Combined didactic and scenario-based education improves the ability of intensive care unit staff to recognize delirium at the bedsideCritical Care, 2008
- A comparison of the CAM-ICU and the NEECHAM Confusion Scale in intensive care delirium assessment: an observational study in non-intubated patientsCritical Care, 2008
- Delirium in the intensive care unitCritical Care, 2008
- Principles of Good Practice for the Translation and Cultural Adaptation Process for Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Measures: Report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural AdaptationValue in Health, 2005
- Delirium as a Predictor of Mortality in Mechanically Ventilated Patients in the Intensive Care UnitPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,2004
- A critique of instruments and methods to detect, diagnose, and rate deliriumJournal of Pain and Symptom Management, 1995