The Confusion Assessment Method: A Systematic Review of Current Usage
Top Cited Papers
- 1 April 2008
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
- Vol. 56 (5), 823-830
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01674.x
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To examine the psychometric properties, adaptations, translations, and applications of the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM), a widely used instrument and diagnostic algorithm for identification of delirium. DESIGN: Systematic literature review. SETTING: Not applicable. MEASUREMENTS: Electronic searches of PubMED, EMBASE, PsychINFO, CINAHL, Ageline, and Google Scholar, augmented by reviews of reference listings, were conducted to identify original English‐language articles using the CAM from January 1, 1991, to December 31, 2006. Two reviewers independently abstracted key information from each article. PARTICIPANTS: Not applicable. RESULTS: Of 239 original articles, 10 (4%) were categorized as validation studies, 16 (7%) as adaptations, 12 (5%) as translations, and 222 (93%) as applications. Validation studies evaluated performance of the CAM against a reference standard. Results were combined across seven high‐quality studies (N=1,071), demonstrating an overall sensitivity of 94% (95% confidence interval (CI)=91–97%) and specificity of 89% (95% CI=85–94%). The CAM has been adapted for use in the intensive care unit, emergency, and institutional settings and for scoring severity and subsyndromal delirium. The CAM has been translated into 10 languages where published articles are available. In application studies, CAM‐rated delirium is most commonly used as a risk factor or outcome but also as an intervention or reference standard. CONCLUSION: The CAM has helped to improve identification of delirium in clinical and research settings. To optimize performance, the CAM should be scored based on observations made during formal cognitive testing, and training is recommended. Future action is needed to optimize use of the CAM and to improve the recognition and management of delirium.This publication has 47 references indexed in Scilit:
- Preliminary Derivation of a Nursing Home Confusion Assessment Method Based on Data from the Minimum Data SetJournal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2007
- Recovery and outcome of delirium in elderly medical inpatientsArchives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 2006
- Impaired Executive Function Is Associated with Delirium After Coronary Artery Bypass Graft SurgeryJournal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2006
- Detection of Delirium by Bedside Nurses Using the Confusion Assessment MethodJournal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2006
- Detection of Delirium in the Intensive Care Unit: Comparison of Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit with Confusion Assessment Method RatingsJournal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2005
- Concurrent validity of two instruments (the Confusion Assessment Method and the Delirium Rating Scale) in the detection of delirium among older medical inpatientsAge and Ageing, 2005
- Delirium as a Predictor of Mortality in Mechanically Ventilated Patients in the Intensive Care UnitJAMA, 2004
- The Role of the Advanced Practice Nurse in Facilitating a Clinical Research StudyClinical Nurse Specialist, 2000
- Reliability and Validity of a New Measure of Severity of DeliriumInternational Psychogeriatrics, 1998
- Detection and Diagnosis of Delirium in the Elderly: Psychiatrist Diagnosis, Confusion Assessment Method, or Consensus Diagnosis?International Psychogeriatrics, 1998